lightbulbs for comments.
no vote.
we (myself, Jesse, Nutty, Sofia, and Perkins) will confer and battle it out amongst ourselves on what makes it in and what doesn't.
Then it will be done and the lurkers can send me their emails of support.
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Incidentally, I totally trust the pink-assault-rifle-coup team to do what's best for the community.
(This does not mean I won't comment on the FAQ changes. Not commenting is not something I do.)
But really, I'm big with the trust.
t imagines Pink with an assault rifle, wearing a corset, as their mascot.
I would so vote for a government run by msbelle and Nutty Vee. There would be pink baseball for everyone.
the original rationale that got us revising, to provide context
I've looked back, and it seems to me ( ita "Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?" Apr 15, 2005 7:06:36 am PDT) that the rationale was just the FAQ being out of date.
Also, funnily enough, the question of editing the edits was addressed then, as well: msbelle "Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?" Apr 15, 2005 8:08:22 am PDT - but I think the current suggestion works better.
I would so vote for a government run by msbelle and Nutty Vee
We have elections here in two months. I would so much prefer voting for the pink cheesebutt party than for anybody who is actually running here.
They're doing the work; they've been part of this community a looong time. I trust them.
If an accidental error is made, I'm sure 8-zillion people will point it out. But I think an actual error ratio will be purty low.
Voting, shmoting.
The man with the gold makes the rules. Or in this case, the rosa chicas with the impetus to do this edit make the rules.
I agree with Erin, most recently, and a bunch of other similar posts upthread.
I also agree with those trusting pink-assault-rifle-coup team. Their work, their call. I also agree with Liese S. re: comments. But if I say, "Have you considered using X in place of Y" and the PARC says, "Yep. We don't think it'll work well," I'll nod and go on my merry way.
Has this come up? Doing some googling/testing, (see if I can be found here easily by others doing the same thing) I found this link, which seems to be, er, Swedes? maybe? quoting and commenting on our COMMs/Buff Dives?
I remember someone linking to this a few years ago. I think they may be Swedish Buffistas....