I subscribe to the right hand threads to use Read New. I don't always go to the Message Center or Home Page.
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Maybe a stompy could edit in a note here -- jengod "Sunnydale Press" Sep 16, 2005 2:09:37 pm PDT -- to warn the spoiler averse that it contains a casting spoiler?
I deleted the text (there wasn't much) of jengod's post because the spoiler's already been mentioned in the appropriate places.
Oh, that's too bad. I think a lot of people who are spoiler averse might light to peek at it, but I understand.
Where do you draw the line? How is someone supposed to know it's a spoiler that they might make an exception for unless you hint around so much that you give it away? If they are interested in the show, they've already had an opportunity to find out, because you posted a link there. If they wouldn't normally watch the show, they'll get warning when the preview airs, because people will start talking about it.
If they are interested in the show, they've already had an opportunity to find out, because you posted a link there.Actually, I didn't post about it in the show thread, I think I noted in Natter that I had it in my lj, but someone did post it in the show thread. I do think some people here who don't watch that show could possibly be interested in that casting spoiler. I never thought of the preview though. I wonder if that will make the preview.
Oops. Sorry. I remembered the post, just not the thread.
There is a post in the show thread.
Plus it was on Whedonesque. (I'm just imagining that many people here also go there.)
Natter 39?
Natter 39 and Holding.
Kinda obvious, but that's all I got....