Can we post a link here? That would be the next place I'd check.
To the new thread? That should be posted at the end of the old one. Which I just did.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Can we post a link here? That would be the next place I'd check.
To the new thread? That should be posted at the end of the old one. Which I just did.
Too bad we can't automate the rollover at 10,000, provided a name is set up in advance.
A name is never really set up in advance, not for sure. That's the problem with a bullshit consensus -- it can all change at the last minute.
Whoops! I forget the thread closer.
Couldn't it just role to the number, and then the name can be edited in, later?
Couldn't you just make do until a stompy comes along? What's the longest gap been so far?
What's the longest anyone's ever had to wait for a new thread? An hour or two? Go watch an infomercial or something.
t x-posty with ita
Couldn't you just make do until a stompy comes along? What's the longest gap been so far?
Oh yes (well, I can). I just was trying to think of ways around it. I don't feel any urgent desire to get around it, though. It always works out, and usually happens immediately. It's not like it's an actual problem. Sorry if my post implied otherwise.
I have seen the Bitches in dire need of a thread as soon as possible. This results in flocking to Natter. If Natter is unavailable there is always the new Natter aka Minearverse.
I have seen the Bitches in dire need of a thread as soon as possible
Is it dire enough to assign it coding time?
Is it dire enough to assign it coding time?
No, silly one. It is actually fun to see them descend upon Natter in urgent need of a thread. It has maybe happened twice.
What are these dire needs of which you speak?