In a WORLD where all threads must be titled: Natter 35.
t /not serious
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
In a WORLD where all threads must be titled: Natter 35.
t /not serious
Natter 35: Scrappy Rules!
Hey, a girl can dream.
Natter 35: Scrappy can dream on, we're still making out with RIO!
Natter 35: Scrappy Rules!
Seconding Robin's nomination.
Natter 35: 51 in Emperor penguin years.
Oh! I had a dream last night that my family was having tea on the lawn, when I noticed that there were king penguins that had somehow made it up to the roof of the ground floor, and were looking in the windows of the first floor. (I rushed up there, of course, to get a better view, accidentally letting in a group of fairy penguins in the process.) I recall being mildly disappointed that they weren't emperors.
Anyway, I vote for the penguin.
What is this? The "Medium" version of democracy?
"Son of No Name!"
I saw it in a vision.
Democracy? Who promised you democracy?
I like Penguin Years.
Gus, "bullshit consensus" as a handy phrase came about this way...
We used to just consense on minor administrativa. And if fifteen or so people all said "Yay" at roughly the same time it was so. Unfortunately, there are time zones, and people who didn't happen to be around during the consensus objected to this process. They grumpily called it a "bullshit consensus" which was one of the things which lead us down the road to voting on stuff.
So, technically "bullshit consensus" would be a consensus that doesn't represent everybody, but merely the folks who were around at the deciding. Since the deciding was not scheduled it wasn't really a true mandate.
However, during the long, arduous, constitutional congress of the Buffistas it just became the handy phrase for things decided by consensus. More or less acknowledging that (a) this isn't a true mandate but (b) it's such a minor thing that it's better to not vote on the tiny stuff.
Thanks for the straight answer, David. Understand, all, that I'm not challenging how Buffistas works. It does work. That puts it way ahead of a lot of things.
I'm curious, though. It seems like minor issues are not decided here by authoritarian means (by fiat) and I'm interested in what that process is.
I could easily just continue to observe.
Thread naming is now moving into fiat status. Development issues are mostly fiat. It really does vary.