'Why We Fight'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Heh. I'm not deeply invested in the title, though. Given a choice, I prefer Spike-free, but I don't really care if it's Spike-ful, either.
Sort of like the way that, given a choice between Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi, I'd pick Diet Coke, but if my only choice is Diet Pepsi, I don't really mind, and I'll drink it.
I don't think we can count the ditching Spike as deliberate. It certainly wasn't on my part. I copied what was in thread. I never noticed his name was absent. Had I noticed, I still would have thought it understood that the thread name is the thread name. Nobody ever mentioned ditching it.
I'll put it back in. If you want to continue discussing and consensing, go ahead. I'll just restore the status quo until you make a decision otherwise.
Ha! I LOVE "It's a Freak Without a Name".
Two for, none against. How many bulls does it take to shit a consensus?
How many bulls does it take to shit a consensus?Coffee. On my monitor.
Also, I will throw my hat in the ring with the freaks, or the bulls, or something.
But mostly, I really want How many bulls does it take to shit a consensus? as a Bureau name, someday.
How many bulls does it take to shit a consensus?
There was some consensing against consensing. It's stompy's pick.
Send chocolate.
Wasn't the line "It's a freak with no face" rather than "without a face"?
I'm all in favor of "Freak With No Name" and dumping Spike from the Bitches.
I like Freak with No Name and like having Spike there, but don't feel strongly.
Jessica speaks for me.