Yeah, once the DVDs are out, we probably ought to close Lovesick. No more spoilers.
'Serenity'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Why did we peak in April? Wonderfalls cancellation?
Why did we peak in April? Wonderfalls cancellation?
Tim's announcement was linked from just about everywhere. It's how I found you guys.
And to that end, here are the top referrers of 2004:
- No Referrer -- 366,276
- [link] -- 4,319
- [link] showid-18158/ -- 1,578
- [link] -- 1,373
- [link] -- 1,364
- [link] -- 689
- [link] buffista.shtml -- 623
- [link] -- 499
- [link] blogger.php -- 486
TWoP didn't make the list? Huh.
Those are the top referring URLS. Here are the top referring hosts:
TWOP probably has less static URLs than the rest.
Top referring URLs of January 2005:
TWOP probably has less static URLs than the rest.
Yeah, kind of when I check referrers to my blog from here: the post_id is different depending on the user's particular navigation (how many new posts he's going through and how many at a time). Since TWoP has fifteen posts per page, there'd be fifteen different URLs that could display the post with the link. No, wait, TWoP doesn't work that way; each page always has the same posts, but when you begin browsing, it will anchor you to your oldest new post, which, depending on when you hit the post with a link, may cause the referrer URL to be different.
...or something.