when she realized it was actually 31 flavors, she laughed and never bothered to change it because it mocked her own hubris
That really does add to the appropriateness of using it as a thread title.
Yes. Lucky for you, people may be in danger.
Buffy ,'Him'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Laura - Jan 24, 2005 7:05:43 am PST #3485 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.
Fred Pete - Jan 24, 2005 7:08:18 am PST #3486 of 10001
Ann, that's a ferret.
rettaN 32 oodikS!
Topic!Cindy - Jan 24, 2005 7:33:30 am PST #3487 of 10001
What is even happening?
Natter 32: 1, Boom!
sumi - Jan 24, 2005 7:38:56 am PST #3488 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!
I like 32: 1 Boom!
Kate P. - Jan 24, 2005 8:01:03 am PST #3489 of 10001
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love
32 Flavors.
Lyra Jane - Jan 24, 2005 8:09:31 am PST #3490 of 10001
Up with the sun
I like 32 flavors. The 3-2-1 joke is cute, but we can use that at 43 or 54 (or 109, yikes!).
Nora Deirdre - Jan 24, 2005 8:15:06 am PST #3491 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
32 Flavors.
And thank you, Lyra Jane for 'splaining the 32: 1 Boom jole before I asked. It's so very much a Monday today, for me.
Steph L. - Jan 24, 2005 8:23:49 am PST #3492 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism
Er, whatever the name is, we are in need of the thread.
§ ita § - Jan 24, 2005 8:25:24 am PST #3493 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I got it.
Pix - Jan 24, 2005 9:59:27 am PST #3494 of 10001
The status is NOT quo.
Just wanted to note that we're less than 400 posts from the end of Great Write #1. The thread doesn't move that fast, but we might want to start thinking about #2.