I'm fairly certain I said no interruptions.

Buffy ,'Potential'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


DXMachina - Dec 22, 2004 4:03:23 am PST #3227 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Speaking of WX, we've had two more forums go walkabout. Spoilers and Smallville are gone.


Steph L. - Dec 22, 2004 4:05:08 am PST #3228 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Natter 31 But We Look 29


Nora Deirdre - Dec 22, 2004 4:08:46 am PST #3229 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

hee, Steph!


sumi - Dec 22, 2004 4:52:35 am PST #3230 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!

I like that one!!!

We could revive the Spikeloost name for the Bitches. . . .


Lyra Jane - Dec 22, 2004 4:53:34 am PST #3231 of 10001
Up with the sun

I don't really give a hoot about the specific title, but I'm requesting less....salty titles.

Thirded. (I think I made this point way back there, right after we started the thread, for the same work-reading reasons as Steph.)

What about Natter 31: Ringing out The Old..., to tie in with the fact it will probably start just a little before the new year?


amych - Dec 22, 2004 4:58:14 am PST #3232 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

What about Natter 31: Ringing out The Old..., to tie in with the fact it will probably start just a little before the new year?

1. We already have a holiday thread

2. I very much doubt the current thread will last until New Year's -- we're less than 200 messages away.

That said, I don't have any brilliant ideas, although I did like "looks like 29."


flea - Dec 22, 2004 5:00:36 am PST #3233 of 10001
information libertarian

Natter 31: Who the fuck cares what it's called.

Oh, you wanted less salty. Also possibly less punchy, eh?


Lyra Jane - Dec 22, 2004 5:03:16 am PST #3234 of 10001
Up with the sun

1. I said "a little before the new year." We're nine days away, which is "a little" in real terms, and it will most likely be the thread on Dec. 31.

2. I understand we have a holiday thread. I still like the Natter 31/Dec. 31/new year's confluence, though I'm certainly not offering the title in anything other than the brainstorming spirit. Which leads to...

3. Maybe I'm being overly touchy, but since when do we make numbered lists entirely to shoot down thread title proposals that have yet to garner any support anyhow? I don't see the necessity.


amych - Dec 22, 2004 5:14:10 am PST #3235 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Sorry about that, LJ -- I saw a couple of things I didn't love about the title, but I really didn't mean it to come off as snarly. Snarly is better saved for the rest of the world today.


Nora Deirdre - Dec 22, 2004 5:23:45 am PST #3236 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

I still like "31 But Looks 29."