I have no objection to affiliate links on the links page. I think it's a good idea. I do object to the other part of Gus's brainstorm, which (if I read it correctly) was to use the [link] conversion code to automatically convert links in posts to the affiliate address. For example, if Hec was to post the Amazon URL to his new book, the code would convert it not just to [link], but would go even further and convert the link to the Buffistas' affiliate URL. To me that would cross a bunch of ethical lines.
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Do affiliate links necessarily mean logos?
Nope.
does powells have an affiliate program? drugstore.com? cafepress?
I'm fine with links on the links page, whether it be a vendor-supplied button-graphic thing, or just a plain, old HTML link. I wouldn't like my own link in a post edited to an affiliate link. That would squick me. I realize it was just brain-storming, and it was good brainstorming, at that, but still, I wouldn't like it.
Can you do affiliate links to Amazon.ca & .co.uk ?
All sorts of places, it seems, have affiliate programs.
I would suggest, if you have a site you shop at, or think people here shop at -- google their name and affiliate program, and come back here with the link, and we can accumulate the possibles.
I have no problem with affiliate links, though I'd prefer no logos. And it would be great if we could affiliate with indie sites like CDBaby and powells.com as well as Amazon.
Can you do affiliate links to Amazon.ca & .co.uk ?
Don't forget .com.au.
Edit: x-post with ita. I don't have time at work right now to look up these sites.
Also, looks like there is no Amazon.com.au--my mistake.
Yes, DX, that was the notion, and, yes, it sneaky and underhanded and otherwise a bad idea because it means all kinds of tricky coding and a table of crossreferences.
Meaning that Microsoft probably already has a patent on it, anyway.
Also, looks like there is no Amazon.com.au--my mistake.
t weeps for my Amazonless nation