(I'm not sure how close to done the Deathmatches are)
We've got to finish Spike and do Wesley and Angel, then we're done.
Buffy ,'Get It Done'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
(I'm not sure how close to done the Deathmatches are)
We've got to finish Spike and do Wesley and Angel, then we're done.
I had posted this earlier in BaBB, I'm moving it here:
I guess the other reason I proposed adding Lost to the SG-1/Smallville/Stargate/Farscape thread, was because there is a great deal of whitefonting and discussion in Natter, and not everyone wants to wade through Natter to discuss the show. Having it's own or a shared thread seems like a good thing, as the interest is growing.
One big problem with whitefonting that I've noticed in the Other Media thread is that people seem less willing to go back and read through whitefonted discussions than they do to just, say, wait a week and catch up on the discussion. So basic questions get asked and answered multiple times.
Also, I find the "let me whitefont only half the words here" way of whitefonting really hard to look at if I'm not selecting the post to read.
What about repurposing Boxed Set as a General TV thread? I don't know how that thread came about, but it seems weird to create a new thread for non-BS shows. What does designate a show as appropriate for Boxed Set? I've seen Sports Night talk in there before, which is nowhere near the same niche as Smallville, Farscape, and Stargate.
One big problem with whitefonting that I've noticed in the Other Media thread is that people seem less willing to go back and read through whitefonted discussions than they do to just, say, wait a week and catch up on the discussion. So basic questions get asked and answered multiple times.
It depends. I'll go back in Jossverse because you're generally only talking about 50 or 100 posts at most. OTOH, if I had to do that in Natter, you're right. I'd never bother.
What about repurposing Boxed Set as a General TV thread?
The thread came about because we combined what had been separate Farscape, Smallville, and Due South threads. Stargate wound up in there because it had been in the Due South thread.
I'd really be against Boxed Set becoming the general purpose thread.
One big problem with whitefonting that I've noticed in the Other Media thread is that people seem less willing to go back and read through whitefonted discussions than they do to just, say, wait a week and catch up on the discussion.
Thing is, we don't have a 15-page/15-day rule here. People skip all the time. I'm not seeing the distinction between whitefonted discussion and non-whitefonted discussion. Do people really choose whether it's worth it to go back and read a discussion based on the color of the text? Man, that's so fontist.
Do people really choose whether it's worth it to go back and read a discussion based on the color of the text? Man, that's so fontist.
No. People who don't want to get spoiled don't read the white font the first time through. After they've finally seen the show, or read the comic, then they have to decide whether to go back, and see what everybody said. It's an easy thing to do a couple days later in Jossverse, much less so in Natter.
What about repurposing Boxed Set as a General TV thread?
As it is I left boxed set when it was created because the discussion was just too diluted. I was following the Stargate discussion in the old Due South thread but when it all got lumped together it was just too much trying to weed out the discussion that I was trying to follow and I ended up dropping the thread. I think making it a General TV thread will only make that worse.
I will say that I never go back and read whitefont in Natter. It's just too hard and the posts are too far apart. I probably would do it in Movies, if a movie had just come out.
However, I've never had the impression that people asking questions that had been previously addressed was more than a passing irritation. I'm pretty sure that I have been guilty of that from time to time, so I hope it hasn't been perceived as rude.