'Touched'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
FWIW, the real reason I stopped by here is to ask if we have some sort of cookie expiration set into the system. I had to log in this morning.
I've been having that problem on my home computer for a few months now. Though strangely, not on my work computer.
Actually, when I asked it, it was a "wonder if Tim has seen?".
If he would have responded right away, I would probably have said something about hopping over to the Angel thread and responding with his reaction.
But yeah, curiousity is me.
DCJ, I didn't say anything about you asking if he'd seen it. Just cautioned that the reflexive next step is to talk about it, and that it wasn't to happen there.
I asked Tim a similar question. However, I must point out that asking if someone, especially the former head honcho, has seen the show is not the same as discussing the episode.
Daniel, you are correct, and your question was fine. However, the question that drew the warning asked Tim what he thought about the ep with regards to another ep. Hard to do a yes/no answer there. Also, I think the warning was useful just to remind folks (many of whom are new) that spoilers for Angel aren't to be discussed in that thread. As Betsy noted earlier in the day, there's a perfectly good Angel thread for that stuff. (Which ita just said.)
no problem.
I think the warning was useful just to remind folks (many of whom are new) that spoilers for Angel aren't to be discussed in that thread. As Betsy noted earlier in the day, there's a perfectly good Angel thread for that stuff. (Which ita just said.)
Actually, it was good for me, too. I always disremember how much FD is in NAFDA.
Do we warn then ban, or warn, warn again, then ban? Cheesebutt, we need you!
(This is only a quest for knowledge. Nothing is happening.)
Try to work it out, warn, suspend, ban.
Oh, that's right. It's warn, then suspend, then ban. I was asking because Gus was proposing different levels of stomping graphic in BBaBB, and I was trying to remember if we had enough steps to do that.
Do we warn then ban, or warn, warn again, then ban?
Shoot. On. Sight.
Oh, sorry. That's zombies. And Fuller Brush men (I'll get you yet, Mr. Johannsen!)
What DX said.