I'm sure he'd be disturbed flattered to hear that.
Dr. Walsh ,'Potential'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Natter 28: Zombies - What's in your head?
Anyone else hearing this in the tone of those Capital One commercials?
Yep.
Tie package to zombies, and you have the perfect 28 title (I meant title. Can too spell). I like "Can we have zombies?" but remain loyal to Tudyk's package.
Look at my zombie package!
Can we have Tudyk's zombie package?
Zombies, look at Tudyk's package!
Um. I'm not sure there is a way to combine those that isn't far too disturbing. Plus "Can we have zombies?" is kinda looking like a consensus.
Consense now all you want.
There's 200 more messages to go, and you know how recency works. So you better keep consensing from now right on through.
Go! Post!
consenses like a mofo
So ita, are you telling us to start the poetry now?
I'm such a consenser, I'm consensing AGAIN!
Can we have zombies?
So it's "Then I ate her brains, now I'm a consenser"?
I would prefer not to combine. Personally, I generally don't think combined titles are as effective; but beyond that, it seems that that's often where trouble starts in losing consensus. So count me, still, for "Can we have zombies?"
Count me, too, as a big ol' numero-ho.
I am doing whatever Katie tells me to do, because I've joined her cult of personality.