'Dirty Girls'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Not Allyson, but I'd bet even money, any amount, that she meant the former.
Thanks, JZ. I'm trying to not be a dick, and did that thing where I composed in notepad and reread what I posted and edited what I thought could be interpretted as lashing out/vengeance.
But am still clarifying. Unless that's causing more trouble. I see where Jessica sees patronizing, and why, and since I was trying to say, "hey, feel your pain, however..." I needed to address that.
It certainly sounds like he's working in filmmaking to me.
Me too. After awhile it turns into hairsplitting. Was I a writer when I decided that I was going to finish a novel come hell or high water? The first time I got paid for my work? When I decided not to go back to work after having Annabel and freelance? Or am I not a writer until I either sell a book or make enough from my freelancing that I wouldn't instantly have to get a job if anything happened to Dylan? I don't know. All I know is AFAIC I'm a writer. A professional writer, too, though not yet an author. And if someone says they're a filmmaker, as long as they're making a good-faith effort to work in that field, that's good enough for me.
And if someone says they're a filmmaker, as long as they're making a good-faith effort to work in that field, that's good enough for me.
I understand your position.
Oh, gah, I should have just said that I was going to also question Sean's post, and not have gone into detail about what I was going to say, because the conversation has become about that, and it's not what I thought was the important thing. What I was trying to get across to Sean is that the bothersome part of his blowup isnt so much that he had the blowup, but that he then blamed ita for his rude behavior, and demanded an apology from her for making him behave rudely.
It would have so much better to just say, "We are soley responsible for what we post. No one is controlling our brains as we compose them and hit post."
"We are soley responsible for what we post. No one is controlling our brains as we compose them and hit post."
I completely agree.
Hee hee hee hee hee.
Sorry.
Hee hee hee hee hee.
No, really. I shouldn't...
Hee hee hee hee hee.
Man, I've been away too long.
*This laughter was not aimed at anyone in particular. I find inappropriate things friggin' hi-larious. This laughter is the sole responsibility of the laugher and is not intended to decry or condone any one position. Closed course, professional laugher - do not attempt. This laughter void in WI, NY, HI, IL, AZ and Seriousness. Refund for laughter 5c, 10c in MI.
Refund for laughter 5c, 10c in MI.
Woohoo! Double the money for me.
Woohoo! Double the money for me.
You paid double in the first place. You're no richer. Plus -- you're in Michigan.
ita has a good point, on both counts.
This laughter is the sole responsibility of the laugher
I forgot to say that we are solely responsible, except in the case of Miracleman, who is controled by either the ferrets, remote controlled zombie robots, and sometimes both.