feh on No consensus. I'd be happy with either
Natter 27: We already did a three cubed thing, didn't we?or
Natter 27: Three Threes A-... Threes... ing.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
feh on No consensus. I'd be happy with either
Natter 27: We already did a three cubed thing, didn't we?or
Natter 27: Three Threes A-... Threes... ing.
All this history I was not a part of.
What's the world coming to when today's youth don't understand our past? It's a scandal!
Pardon me, I'm having "Gang of 14" flashbacks.
For the uninitiated: During the early days of B'cacy, somebody analyzed the posts and found that 14 people posted a large majority of posts in the thread. When this info became public, kerfuffle ensued.
Natter 27: Kerfuffle Ensued
I think that's close to invoking one. I'm going with the threes doing that three thing they three.
Threes Threes a Threeing is OK by me too.
Works for me.
t shakes head sadly Ah, the wrong-headedness.
Anyway, for the future, can we try not to start thinking up titles until there are just 100 posts left? Starting the damn process too early is what leads to crazy-making, I feel.
I like the three threes a threeing, also.
Is that an official proposal, Jesse?
t /kidding
my favorite is still:
Natter 27: We already did a three cubed thing, didn't we?
I'd just like to throw my support there, if we're doing that sort of thing.