Why do we even let him post? I swear.
Cause he's pretty?
My whole life just flashed before my eyes! I gotta get me a life!
Xander ,'Dirty Girls'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Kristen - Jul 07, 2004 11:21:32 am PDT #1513 of 10001
DXMachina - Jul 07, 2004 11:22:28 am PDT #1514 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Jeebus. Was that Tim traffic in April?
The spike in the April visitors graph is the day he announced the cancellation.
Dana - Jul 07, 2004 11:24:55 am PDT #1515 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
April 3rd.
DXMachina - Jul 07, 2004 11:34:25 am PDT #1516 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Yup.
Jon B. - Jul 07, 2004 11:40:06 am PDT #1517 of 10001
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
What was the bandwidth like in May? The graphs jump from April to June.
§ ita § - Jul 07, 2004 11:47:40 am PDT #1518 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I don't have that graphic to hand, Jon.
Jon B. - Jul 07, 2004 12:02:19 pm PDT #1519 of 10001
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
OK. No worries. I thought you might have accidentally omitted it.
§ ita § - Jul 07, 2004 12:04:40 pm PDT #1520 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Nope. Didn't save it that month.
I'm now running a report that spans those three months, but it could take a while.
msbelle - Jul 07, 2004 12:08:15 pm PDT #1521 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
That's not been one of our bottlenecks, traditionally. The beginning of this year was pretty hellacious though.
I don;t think I understand. What is our problem then?
§ ita § - Jul 07, 2004 12:10:16 pm PDT #1522 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
What is our problem then?
CPU cycles. There's very little we can do to change the amount of bandwidth we use, save a killing spree (which I'm always down for). But the way that our current architecture uses CPU cycles, we need a box to ourselves, because we'd bring everyone else on a shared server to a halt.