17!
Sorry, that's all I have to say.
t /content-less Natter, which is even worse than regular Natter
t /apologies that are longer than the thing they apologize for
Cordelia: You're him. You're Angel's son. Connor: It's not like I got to choose.
'Hell Bound'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Nilly - Jul 05, 2004 6:21:54 am PDT #1489 of 10001
Swouncing
Lee - Jul 05, 2004 6:28:00 am PDT #1490 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
oops
Lee - Jul 05, 2004 6:28:04 am PDT #1491 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
I'd still like to see us return to the practice of deciding the title in Bitches, and then coming here to tell the stompies what it is, rather than discussing it in both places.
Wolfram - Jul 05, 2004 3:10:37 pm PDT #1492 of 10001
Visilurking
I promised to have this posted on Monday so here goes (language to be revised, rewritten, recycled or just trashed as discussion commences):
Proposal: To have a Book Club thread wherein a specific book (or books) would be discussed Buffista style on a specific time rotation (weekly, biweekly or monthly.) All the fine details, including method of book selection, number of books per rotation, length of rotation, and length of discussion period, would be hammered out exclusively in the proposed thread by the denizens thereof.
Purpose: The purpose of the thread is to accomodate an expressed desire by a number of Buffistas in Literary to have such a thread to allow focused and uninhibited discussion on a particular text as well as providing us with an opportunity and excuse to read and discuss books that may be outside our usual genre.
(BTW, this is a post-and-run so feel free to open up LB at any point tonight or tommorow morning.)
DXMachina - Jul 05, 2004 3:23:47 pm PDT #1493 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Done.
Susan W. - Jul 05, 2004 5:50:03 pm PDT #1494 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights
Is my current tagline too spammy/commercial? I'll delete it if there's a consensus in that direction.
Connie Neil - Jul 05, 2004 8:34:05 pm PDT #1495 of 10001
brillig
If it were a direct link, there might be some argument against, I think. It's not like you're having pop-ups show up.
t pauses to consider the whole realm of horror if individuals had their own pop-ups.
Betsy HP - Jul 06, 2004 6:37:20 am PDT #1496 of 10001
If I only had a brain...
You're a long-established member of the community, so I don't see it as a problem. It's clear that you're here for the company, not the commercial opportunities. If somebody joined solely for the purpose of spamming a URL, that would be different.
§ ita § - Jul 06, 2004 6:46:06 am PDT #1497 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
We just have to be careful we're consistent.
Have you added it to the links page, Susan?
DXMachina - Jul 06, 2004 6:46:31 am PDT #1498 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
There's also precedent. Evil Jimi has used his tag since the TT days to pimp the site he runs. No one has ever had a problem with that.