I love these numbers much more than the numbers I'm trying to work with. Also, I'm not trying to do anything to them right now, just look. D'you think there's a connection?
Hmm, the sentence above is a very strange way to spell "thanks, ita". Maybe I did do something mathy to some of the letters in it, and forgot to do the inverse.
May daily visitor graph.
The peaks were Angel night and the troughs the weekends?
DayHitsVisitorsBandwidth (KB)
Sunday182,9006,9062,010,129
Monday328,6678,8853,613,866
Tuesday302,6117,6093,425,178
Wednesday339,7908,1643,715,848
Thursday300,0657,7453,406,296
Friday242,1456,6862,738,828
Saturday135,1175,1581,474,402
Total1,831,29551,15320,384,550
tommyrot, I think that's ita's way of saying, "Yes."
Then ita is spelling "yes" even longer than I am spelling "thanks", and with much more fancy HTML, too
t /Natter
[Edit: Ha! And it was longer than "yes", and therefore my spelling is still the strangest and my post in this thread right now is still the Natteriest]
[One last Edit: ita and I share a post number, even though we didn't post in the same second. Huh.]
No, it's my way of saying not precisely -- Wednesdays have the most hits, but Monday has the most visitors -- and visitor count was the graph I posted.
Wednesdays have the most hits, but Monday has the most visitors
How is a hit distinguished from a visitor? Is a hit coming to b.org, and a visitor one who actually goes into threads?
The bandwidth is highest on Wednesdays, too (look, topic!).
A hit happens every time you load a page.
edit: or does each graphic count too? but if it did, the graphics would be cached on the browser after the first time, right?
The bandwidth/hits ratio is higher on low-hit days. It slopes. Not very intuitive.
Higher hits, lower post length, maybe?