I like:
(Two bits and they're both naughty).
Natter 25 is ALIVE
Also Gus's presidential one that I'm too lazy to go back and copy.
I was under the impression that I was your big comfy blanky.
Oz ,'Him'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
brenda m - Jun 02, 2004 7:27:00 am PDT #1047 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Katie M - Jun 02, 2004 7:36:27 am PDT #1048 of 10001
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies
tommyrot's makes me laugh.
DavidS - Jun 02, 2004 7:56:59 am PDT #1049 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Natter 25: Shave and a haircut - show nape!
Megan's my new best friend.
I'm with Brenda. Is there no love for "25 letters and a redneck"?
This is good too.
Megan E. - Jun 02, 2004 8:07:01 am PDT #1050 of 10001
I thought you'd like that, Hec.
Sean K - Jun 02, 2004 10:10:42 am PDT #1051 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Oddly, I have no love for that. And I'll also have no love for anyone that saddles me with a 10,000 post long earworm.
You're just a loveless woman today.
I actually have no preference, for a change.
Actually, that's not true. I like tommyrot's idea.
Allyson - Jun 02, 2004 2:48:24 pm PDT #1052 of 10001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
Do we have any language on this site that says that anything posted is the property of the person who posted it and if you quote me you damn well better cite me?
That sort of thing?
§ ita § - Jun 02, 2004 2:51:40 pm PDT #1053 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
No, we don't. Nothing more than
Individual posters are responsible for the content of their posts.
Do most sites say more?
Allyson - Jun 02, 2004 2:55:38 pm PDT #1054 of 10001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
The Well is explicit in not repeating posts outside of the Well without the user's consent. I think it's not really an enforceable thing, (Whedonesque) but that it's about publishing other's words.
§ ita § - Jun 02, 2004 2:56:42 pm PDT #1055 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Do you have to log into the Well to read their posts?
Pix - Jun 02, 2004 2:59:08 pm PDT #1056 of 10001
We're all getting played with, babe. -Weird Barbie
Do we have any language on this site that says that anything posted is the property of the person who posted it and if you quote me you damn well better cite me?
I don't know how much exiting copyright law applies to Internet sites, but in terms of academic do's and don'ts, we teach our students that if they quote anything they sure as hell better cite it. If they can't cite a full name of the author (such as on a site like this one), they must cite the poster's nickname and the full website address as well as date of post and date of download. They wouldn't need to seek permission, however--they just need to give credit.
I get the feeling from this and from your post in Natter that this has become an issue?
ETA: Never mind. None of my business.