It wouldn't really be a re-vote, it would be a vote off.
We're really close and there are about thirty people not included in that close decision. The will of the whole group could be more clearly discerned if we voted again between the top two.
And while I respect the "we have a decision, let's go with it" pov, I don't appreciate the notion that even
discussing
a vote-off is "stirring up trouble". It's a reasonable thing to consider and a day or so doing so a) won't kill us and b) could lead us to a location that the majority of the people involved support.
The majority of people may (or may not) support NO. So far, it looks like the majority of people do
not
support a re-vote. Or a vote-off. Or even a cagematch, other than me.
I think there'd be wide support for an ita cagematch. It's finding someone to fight you that would be tricky.
I'll fight ita for half the purse.
With four excellent candidates, it's no surprise it was a close vote.
I'm for moving on to the detail planning.
I'll go for a consensus. The question is do we do an additional vote or accept the choice and move on. Also, if we do vote what method do we use. Here is my caveat since I tried to ask about voting issues BEFORE the vote and amazingly everyone was quiet. I need to see at least 30 different people in favor of this and actually discussing it. Over 60 people voted so I think it's fair to ask for input from at least half of the folks. Otherwise this is done and we move on.
Count me as accepting the vote and planning to scam the IRS.
accept the choice and move on
Accept the choice and move on.