I consider anything under 10 hours an easy day's drive.
Of course my ideas of distance might be a little frelled.
'Origin'
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: New Orleans! May 20-22, 2005!
I consider anything under 10 hours an easy day's drive.
Of course my ideas of distance might be a little frelled.
I prefer 6 and under, but 8 or 9 is still doable. I drove from Dallas to DC once.
I did Los Angeles to Spokane in one shot solo. Did San Diego to Spokane and vice versa many times in one shot with a second driver to trade off.
After Minneapolis, I had to downgrade my one day's drive from 19 to 13 hours.
Of course my ideas of distance might be a little frelled.
exactly. whereas I think anything over three is a pain the ass. But, now that I have the shiny new car, maybe not.
whereas I think anything over three is a pain the ass.
Me too, but I am a total travel wuss, so don't mind me.
Do we still need to decide on the exact wording of the ballot? I thought voting was supposed to have started already....
That's what I'm waiting on.
Okay, so Jon’s suggestion is thus:
I do think we should ask people to indicate, for each city, if they
a) almost definitely would attend
b) might attend
c) probably would not attend
d) almost definitely would not attend
If a city has a plurality of the vote, but a high negative score, and another city is a close second but with a much lower negative, we should maybe consider the second place choice.
Here's what Noise laid out (although he's on record as preferring one vote for one city):
It sounds like we could do each of the four cities and then give the option for "Would Attend" "Would Not Attend" and then score from there. We could also have the each voter rank the choices from 1 to 4, or just choose one city or two cities.
If we go with ranking, how do we score that for the final choice?
Deb agrees with Noise (the one vote option), as does Hil, with one caveat:
I think I'm in favor of one vote, with a survey sort of "which cities would you be able to attend?" question, so that, if the final vote is really close (like, within a few votes), but a lot more people would be able to attend one than the other, we could see that. (I seriously doubt that would happen, but I think it would be nice to be able to see the data.)
Jessica is either for ranking or just one vote.
I'm in favor of ranking, or at least a "will/can not attend this city" option (i.e., Jon's suggestion).
No one else has stated a clear preference. I may have missed someone, though. If I did, my apologies.
It seems as if the bullshit consensus is one vote, but it's awfully close. Anyone else have thoughts?
Cereal: I hope I'm not railroading anything here. I'm not trying to, and I'm sorry if it seems like I am. I'm... well, I'm a really good terrier, which is why I'm a good stage manager.