I have a strong preference for NOLA at this point, though Cleveland and Minneapolis are also attractive. I went to Kansas City for work a few years ago and didn't think much of the city, but I'm willing to accept that a savvy local could turn that around for me.

IIRC, Erin and Gudanov are in KC, with Erin as point.

Also tina is in Lawrence, KS.

I went to Kansas City for work a few years ago and didn't think much of the city, but I'm willing to accept that a savvy local could turn that around for me.

And now, this time with 100% more buffistas.

Also tina is in Lawrence, KS.

And Mr. Broom is in Bonner Springs.

Though he prefers to be in Lawrence at any given time. Honestly, in terms of sheer awesomeness, Lawrence would beat KC hands down. It's a much smaller town than KC--only about 60,000 people--but it's full of good bars, good places for music, nifty little shops, and nice parks. Of course, it's a good forty miles from the airport, so it'd be a tad out of the way. Even though I've been here less than two weeks, I'm all about having F2F hotness here. Also, I was not aware other Buffistas lived around here. Rock.

Mr. B, how serious is the suggestion? Because there are shuttle buses between the Kansas City airport and Lawrence. So if Lawrence has decent intra-city public transport, walkability, and disability access (and I'd be surprised if a college town didn't...), it might even be doable.

Of course, it's a good forty miles from the airport,

Heh. laughs the laugh of the Californian at 40 miles being anything other than a negligible distance

And how cosmopolitan is it? Because the question of corsets and tiaras, worn en masse to a bowling alley in mid-afternoon, drawing hostility has to be considered.

I doubt people would come at us with pipes. We could get stared at maybe.

Face it, we're a bunch of not-kid mostly white people. As long as we're spending money and not breaking shit no one anywhere is going to care what the hell we do.

Not everything is an extreme, Trudy; there's a sizeable grey zone between your two examples.

Staring I can deal with; people with pipes I can pound legitimately on in return, if need be.

But how do you class rude comments, coming from snickering insulting groups of locals? Is that a possibility? Because I want to be somewhere where I can enjoy myself, and not worry about it. That's one of my definitions - a fairly broad-ranging one - of a cosmopolitan destination: one where variance in the visitors to said destination can be absorbed without making said visitors wonder why they're throwing tourist dollars at said destination in the first place.

I know nothing of Lawrence, Kansas, except that I like their library. I hasten to assure one and all that I have no reason to assume it wouldn't be a delightful place to visit; I'm also told KC rocks, and has great BBQ. But I'm not pushing any particular city or any particular agenda, either.

I just want to know if I'm going to be made to regret spending upwards of $700 and four days of my life on a visit, because of a provincial take on unusual groups of visitors.

And that question goes for any of our destinations. You may recall I asked Heather and Dana about the present-day police situation in New Orleans.