I'm not at all surprised the hotel is saying we didn't meet the quota.

Just to clarify, the hotel is NOT saying we didn't meet a quota. The hotel isn't saying anything at all. I'M contacting them to ask them questions so I can (a) update next year's RFP, (b) ping ND the Banker later for the correct/appropriate costs (tbd), and (c) find out what my room charges were. Since they had my charge card # for ages, handwaving is all they did at me at check out, which, airport calling, was fine at the time. My separate paragraphs in a much earlier post were clearly clear only to me. Sorry for the confusion! We don't have any outstanding issues with the hotel or they with us/me.

Yeah, I was thinking on it, and I started the night with $50 in my wallet, burned through that, and then went to the cash machine, got quite a bit more, and burned through a lot of that.

See! I'm not the only one figuring out drinks with math. (Well, arithmetic.)

Oh, okay! Never mind then.

Changing the subject a little. Nick has decided that he and his two closest friends are moving to San Diego in August. If he's in CA when Nilly visits, would he be welcome at any little buffista shindig? He would like to meet everyone.

I think it's a bird's responsibility to be big enough for spiders to not eat them. The arachnids are just being entrepreneurial.

I've missed the conversation, but I feel compelled to add that I spent at least $30 at the bar, and I tipped.

That total? WAY off.

Also? $6 a drink when the drinks are that piss poor is hard to forget.

Realizing that it's a phobia, and therefore irrantional, I still have to come down on the side of spiders should not be big enough to eat birds.

Pfft. The Sydney funnelweb is one of the deadliest spiders on earth. Yet its venom is not that dangerous to cats, dogs and most other mammals. It is, however, unusually toxic to primates, including humans. Which feature evolved without a single primate on the entire freakin' continent.

This? Is what spiders should not be. Size, for me, is a distant second. (Though as the Sydney funnelweb is large enough to snack on small rodents, you'd probably find it uncomfortably big as well. Me, if it's that venomous, I damn well want to be able to see it.)

They're insects (edit: or not - are arachnids insects? Do I care? They're bugs, damnit!), and they hunt and eat birds.

Driver ants will hunt and eat chickens. and indeed anything too stupid to get out of their way. Also? Completely blind. It's a neat trick.

That's just wrong. Things with exoskeletons shouldn't be able to devour things with endoskeletons (is that a word?). It's against Nature and violates the Circle of Life. Wrong like a wrong thing.

Well, aside from the aforementioned driver ants (and army ants in South America), there are also jellyfish which will happily eat fish (ok, pretty emotionlessly, as they're a bit short in the brain department), the same goes for squid, mantis shrimp, sea anemones and octopus. Crabs will eat baby turtles, among other things. On land, large scorpions and centipedes will not be averse to a bit of endothermic prey. That brings us up to ten, I think. What else? Something should be eating frogs, I think. Well, tarantulas do, though there are tarantulas in Texas that have a symbiotic relationship with the little hoppers. They share living space. The frog eats any insects that might chow down on the spider's eggs, and the tarantula eats or scares off most things that would come looking for the frog. Not only does it bite, but it can fire off its hairs at an opponent's eyes and face. The hairs are barbed and tough to remove.

Anyway, you can get to the dozen by variations on the above themes (e.g. Portuguese men-o-war, which strictly aren't jellyfish, and so on), but I think I'll leave it at that. This is without getting into parasites and scavengers, of course.

OK, no spiders here, but speaking of animals and knowing things about them:

One of the gifts Annabel has received from doting friends and family is a rather sweet little book called Hug, starring a baby chimpanzee. Everyone who is not me who has picked the book up so far and read it to Annabel starts out, "Look, Annabel! It's a baby monkey." To which I'm wordlessly screaming, "No, you idiot, that's a chimpanzee! Which is obvious because it has no tail and alternates between standing upright and knuckle-walking. Didn't anyone else read National Geographic when they were kids?"

And then I wistfully think that if billytea were here, he'd understand my silent indignation.

And then I wistfully think that if billytea were here, he'd understand my silent indignation.

It's true. Bugs me too when people do that.

Anyone else picture billytea leaning back with a smoke after a post like 4990?