I lurve all the baby-naming. I may need to name my (as-yet-unforseen) child Faramir, but only after Pippin's kid.

I had wanted to name a kid of mine Pip, but that was from Dickens. And then read LotR and I extended it to Pippin, and then I developed a crush on Scottie Pippen.

It was too late to use it as a name and retain my pride then. It's so much worse now.

Much much worse.

Pippin is such a nice name, too. Unusual, but not too weird. Short, although I don't think teachers still make you write your name for punishment. I never did that, but my uncle did. Short names were a must for his kids.

Love how I casually wander off topic?

Despite my fervent Pippin love ala LOTR, I still get ear wormed with Pippin: The Musical! 8 out of 10 times I hear the name.

And the men go marching...out into the fray...conquering the enemy and carrying the day...Hark the blood is pounding in our ears!...Jubilation! I can hear a grateful nation cheer.

Pippin. Sit Down!

I suppose that bit fits nicely regardless.

Not only did Merry and Pippin both spend their last years in Gondor, but after Aragorn died, their tombs were moved to lie on either side of his.

I love the details about the different copies made of Bilbo/Frodo's original writings, including the "Thain's Book" that was copied in the Shire, and brought to Minas Tirith by Pippin when he left the Shire for good. This was the one that included the translations from the Elvish by Bilbo, and most of the notes that were included into the various copies by Sam and Merry after Frodo sailed West. Barahir, Faramir and Eowyn's grandson, added some stuff, and a final note was made about Arwen's end and the sailing of Gimli and Legolas.

Also something about Elladan and Elrohir and Celeborn.

FotR is on Encore right now and they're going to show TTT tomorrow night. (Well tomorrow during the day and during the evening.)

I lurve all the baby-naming. I may need to name my (as-yet-unforseen) child Faramir, but only after Pippin's kid.

We never did agree on a boy's name. At one point we were tossing around Theoden, and I think we were both a tiny bit serious.

I mean, we could've called him Theo.

Friends of mine named a daughter Peregrine, called Pippin for short -- she's 16 now and kind of alternately chuffed and annoyed that her cool and unique name has been suddenly popularized.

Okay! Who wants to help me abuse the thread again to write another paper?

One of my final questions is "What aspects of the book did the film convey most and least successfully?"

My initial thoughts are something like this: The film was very successful at actually creating the locations and the creatures. Gollum, of course. The Black Riders, which are hella more creepy in the movie than in the book. Anything that really involved costuming or props - the Elves looked like Elves. The hobbits looked like hobbits. Rivendell, Moria, Minas Tirith, Edoras, all seemed like real places.

I also think the movies did an excellent job of conveying the spirit of the story rather than sticking slavishly to things that would have been unfilmable for various reasons.

Less successful: Many of the relationships in the book were truncated or altered. Faramir and Eowyn (although that will supposedly be restored). Aragorn's friendship with Gandalf. Less depth to the hobbit community, although I was just as happy to be spared Frodo's seventeen-year wait before he left with the Ring. Changes to Faramir and Denethor's characters.

Other thoughts?