I like how they describe Denethor's palantir after his death, as only showing two hands slowly clenching in fire, unless the person doing the viewing had a strong enough will to bring the palantir to heel.
'War Stories'
LotR - The Return of the King: "We named the *dog* 'Strider'".
Frodo: Please, what does it always mean, this... this "Aragorn"? Elrond: That's his name. Aragorn, son of Arathorn. Aragorn: I like "Strider." Elrond: We named the *dog* "Strider".
A discussion of Lord of the Rings - The Return of the King. If you're a pervy hobbit fancier, this is the place for you.
Also, the change to his demise made the character less than he was in the book
Yes, this. Denethor is just about the only instance in the movies where a major character suffered as a result of the adaptation. Almost everyone else got more interesting and complicated, not less.
I felt sorry for John Noble, because the book-Denethor was an interesting guy, if tragic. Movie-Denethor, NSM.
I felt sorry for John Noble, because the book-Denethor was an interesting guy, if tragic. Movie-Denethor, NSM.
Doubly so because I thought Noble was very good in the role they gave him, and I think he would have been fine if it had been as written.
Making him lose it bascially just over his sons diminishes his character, whereas in the book, because of the palantir and Sauron, he thinks all hope is lost period - his sons are the final straw, not the whole enchilada (to mix metaphors).
Did we know that Karl Urban is going to be in the new Bourne movie?
Kathy Astrom posted this link over on WX:
And it's a JJ Abrams and it's got Ian Somerhalder so lots of the pretty, no?
Yay! Go Dom with the career having.
Okay, Billy needs work now.
You mean, better work.
What's he doing now? I didn't see anything in IMDB later than RotK.
He's going to be the voice of the doll in Seed of Chucky.