justkim, I felt the same way. THere were som many things that were just left open. Like, the guy Liir saw carrying The Grimmerie, how did the page of The Grimmerie come to be where Liir found it? Who the everloving FUCK was Yackle? Just some prophet? And what possible good came from 3000 birds buzzing the Emerald City? And what the fuck about Nor? She just turned into some freakish Brad Pitt Seven Monkeys character ?

He really really dropped the ball. I loved then ending, as in, the last little bit. As in, the last sentence. Because being the Elphaba lover I am, it's nice to know she's living on and hopefully, the baby will be more like her Grandmother than her father, I hope.

Sheryl, Gosh. I haven't read the book in 20 years (oog) so all I remember is the frustrating ending.

Yes! That's it exactly!

Edited to add: The whole part about the dragons just seemed so random and not a part of any Oz I ever knew. At least it provided an answer to the murders.

But ya know what? I hated that answer. I would have preferred it been, I don't know Winkies on the rampage. Or we find out the people killed were persecutors of Animals and the scrapings were part of the Elphaba Lives! movement. SOMETHING besides "Uh...the Emperor needed a weapon to get the flying things and well, dragons fly." Also, there was none, and I mean NO chemistry between Liir and Trism to justify a love affair. None. And that screamed to me like, "Well, I'm gay, so someone in this book has to have the gay sex." I don't mind gay sex, mind you. (So many doors open with that statement.) but I need ANY sex in my books to have chemistry. That whole scene read to me as, well, you're here. Peg A, Slot B.

Dammit.

You're not wrong. The whole book was just random events happening randomly. And not in a "Life sure is funny" kind of way.

What bugs me on the whole about it is that obviously (to me, anyway), he wrote it because of the pop-u-larity of the musical. Here's some more Wicked - watch it fly off the shelves. I enjoyed the premise of Wicked because I like the other side of any story. But this isn't the other side of any story. This is a novel with characters from other novels in it. Wicked at least made references to The Wizard of Oz. This had nothing to reference. And the story lacked because of that. If it had been a different story of someone other than the Son of Elphaba , it might have evoked altogether feelings from me. On the other hand, I might not have read it, either.

The second Alatriste book is out in translation.

(I saw it at Barnes and Noble this weekend.)

Has anyone here read Octavia Butler's The Fledgling? Did I miss a whole discussion about it?

There's new Butler? Hooray!

I was wondering -- what did people find to be their best reads published in 2005? I never read the book section of any publication, because I don't read in a timely manner. I think I read the latest Harry Potter, the latest Bujold, and if Crusie published in 2005, then hers too. Unless Kat slipped something by me. I'm appalling. Or old school. Whichever.

One of my best reads of the year was definitely The Half-Blood Prince. Also loved Jodi Picoult's My Sister's Keeper, and Crusie's Bet Me, but I think that might have been a 2004 book, officially.