No, that's never happened to me before, why do you ask?
Hee. I'm afraid to try any of the historical fiction I adored growing up (an eclectic assortment--Pearl Buck, Belva Plain, Eugenia Price, Alexandra Ripley, Herman Wouk, John Jakes, Taylor Caldwell) for fear of discovering the exact same thing.
Yes, fine, I admit it, there was an unspoken "Piers Anthony" in that sentence.
What would teenagers read if it weren't for Piers Anthony?
I tried to read the first Thomas Covenant book and got maybe 25 pages into it before losing interest. I thought it was really dull. I'm surprised so many other people liked (or at least finished) them. Maybe they pick up...?
eta:
also, did not read any Piers Anthony books. I win!
Didn't we all read Xanth?
Please. As if I'd ever admit it in public.
I reread/skimmed the Xanth books I had before I got rid of them. His portrayals of women are really appalling.
no
I'm going to assume that's an age thing, because I don't think I could possibly have not read Xanth. It was just so
there,
during the voracious years. And it was such a fast read that even when I suspected it stank, momentum meant I read three or four more books before I stopped and sold them.