Sean Stewart wrote Mockingbird, about a pregnant woman (and from her POV), and it was quite good. (Though, since I've never been pregnant, I can't say whether it's accurate.)
It was pretty accurate. As someone who has been pregnant, I consider it more of a not-quite successful attempt (and his second-weakest book), and think he'd have been better off with the slight distance of third person limited, but I'm really picky about first person.
He has the honor of writing the most accurate fictional portrayal of someone who has miscarried (in Resurrection Man) and never quite healed emotionally.
One thing I noticed not too long ago is that while I really liked Ursula K. LeGuin's earlier works, the most recent stuff that she's done as a "feminist" writer has left me cold. I certainly don't begrudge her writing a female protagonist (which she also did back in The Tombs of Atuan during her earlier period), but the women = wise and good and longsuffering, men = cruel and stupid or resentfully powerless before the awesome generative power of the Womb-bearer really starts to rankle after a hundred pages or so.
I certainly don't begrudge her writing a female protagonist (which she also did back in The Tombs of Atuan during her earlier period), but the women = wise and good and longsuffering, men = cruel and stupid or resentfully powerless before the awesome generative power of the Womb-bearer really starts to rankle after a hundred pages or so.
Wait, I can blame LeGuin for
Everybody Loves Raymond?
I think that one of the best romance authors at writing interesting and believable heroes is Nora Roberts. You can tell that she's had extensive real-life experience with men (she has four brothers and two sons, in addition to her husband), because she really does a good job at making them believable. My favorite of her trilogies is the Chesapeake Bay series, featuring three adopted brothers. The trilogies that focus on women more, while mostly fun to read, just aren't as fascinating to me. I did like Three Fates, mostly because of the Irish family that's at the core of the story, as well as the excellent opening sequence on board the Lusitania.
Matt, are you referring to just the stuff in the Earthsea universe, or all her work? I thought that
Tehanu
was rather weak -- or, I guess, rather too obvious in its retconny feminist intent -- but that the last novel was OK. The short stories seemed a bit scattershot, in their political intent, but tended to be good stories after all.
When you look at it, really,
The Tombs of Atuan
buys into a lot of the woman=connected to the earth, and actually kinda evil, nonsense, which I think she tried to revise in the later novels.
Tehanu was the standard bearer, I suppose, but other non-Earthsea books as well like Always Coming Home, which I didn't even finish. I haven't read the Tales of Earthsea collection yet for fear that Magical Crispy Dragon Girl might reappear.
Considering that the particular patch of earth those women were close to in The Tombs of Atuan was inhabited by primordial powers of darkness, I'm not sure I'd take the evilness as a commentary on the gender as a whole.
I think that one of the best romance authors at writing interesting and believable heroes is Nora Roberts.
Nora writes great guys. They always have guy habits, and talk like men I know.
Hee. I had a list of words you'll never see in a romance novel sex scene. (Current favourite: Grunties.) I think 'premature ejaculation' can be added to the list.
Heh.
the women = wise and good and longsuffering, men = cruel and stupid or resentfully powerless before the awesome generative power of the Womb-bearer
Did someone say Sheri S. Tepper?
Did someone say Sheri S. Tepper?
Eh. You say Sheri S. Tepper, I say Roseanne.
She doesn't have to put on the red light.
Er... sorry, my hearing's not so good.