Huh. I didn't hafta register. I'd imagine it's the same as NYT buffistas/foamy
'Destiny'
We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
bugmenot.com is always a good bet.
This dick needs a giant cluesticking. "Hogwarts fans, you're stupid, stupid, stupid"
Oh my God. I hate that guy. Wow. Talk about...I don't even know. Grr.
Wow, that was a monumentally stupid article. IMO, the worse line of the whole thing was:
I'm sorry you were born too late for J.K. Rowling, but you had your C.S. Lewis and E.B. White and J.R.R. Tolkien. Isn't it a clue that you should be ashamed of reading these books past puberty when the adults who write them are hiding their first names?
Ummm....yeah. Better go clear those children's books like The Elements of Style and Till We Have Faces off my shelves right now.
t rolls eyes forever
Yeah, you should be totally ashamed of reading The Great Gatsby.
Not to mention T.S. Eliot, E.L. Doctrow, W.H. Auden, etc.
I'm also not sure what makes it a strictly children's book. Because the main character is younger?
It was printed alongside this rebuttal.
He does know that E.B. White and C.S. Lewis wrote lots of stuff for adults as well, doesn't he? Or is he really that stupid?
Nice rebuttal. Thanks for posting the link, Heather. I'm reminded of something C.S. Lewis once wrote about how after talking to certain academics and other self-professed scholarly types, he would have had no idea that Jane Austen's books were supposed to be funny.
On edit: Why is it that some critics seem to assume that "popular" = "bad"? Or that something has to be complex to be of artistic merit?
He also suggested Sesame Street and Teletubbies were only for rich white kids, so I'm guessing yeah, he's that stupid.