I just think it's rather odd that a nation that prides itself on its virility should feel compelled to strap on forty pounds of protective gear just in order to play rugby.

Giles ,'Beneath You'


We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good  

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


deborah grabien - Feb 16, 2004 9:09:27 am PST #805 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Is the problem the anonymity? Does it make a difference if I trash your book and sign my name?

I think a lot of people are worried by anonymous reviews, but like you, I don't really get it. What's the big deal? I have other issues with an anonymous review mindset (see below), but truth to tell, I'm far more aggravated by the fact that at a publication like PW, which unlike the occasional "reader from West Armpit" a bad review can break a writer, the reviews are handed off to a pool of anonymous reviewers. They can do a metric ton of damage, and they very often do. Yet a positive review doesn't necessarily help sales at all.

But speaking just for me, I personally don't understand why anyone genuinely reviewing a book, with no agenda other than to voice an opinion, would want to remain anonymous. Shit, I've been a book reviewer, and I can't imagine not signing my name. So, sign your name. You're brave enough, or feel strongly enough, to have written a scathing or glowing review? Why be afraid to say who you are? I just don't get that. It seems passive-aggressive in the extreme.

I see a very weird attitude a lot on readerville, where I'm a semi-regular: a writer will get an anonymous review that trashes their book, and every other author up there will spring into the fray: it must be someone you know. A former student? A girl you went to high school with? Someone who wrote a book with a similar theme that didn't get published?

The one thing no one seems willing to concede is that maybe, just maybe, someone genuinely didn't like the book.

But everything to do with that story really did creep me out.


Betsy HP - Feb 16, 2004 9:14:05 am PST #806 of 10002
If I only had a brain...

I personally don't understand why anyone genuinely reviewing a book, with no agenda other than to voice an opinion, would want to remain anonymous.

Simple. On a very public forum like Amazon, I don't want thousands of strangers knowing my name and address.


erikaj - Feb 16, 2004 9:16:16 am PST #807 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

See, that would be my first thought, not who I pissed off.


§ ita § - Feb 16, 2004 9:17:02 am PST #808 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I don't want thousands of strangers knowing my name and address.

Ayup. I don't use my full name on the public internet, period. So any review by me is going to look like a pseud anyway.


deborah grabien - Feb 16, 2004 9:18:53 am PST #809 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Betsy, is there any reason you can't use an pseud? The objection from me is to "a reader from...."

I don't want thousands of strangers knowing my address either. But if I'm going to go to the trouble of writing and posting a review, it's presumably because I have a strong opinion about the work in question. And "a reader from a city in which there are eight million other readers and you'll never know who I am, neener" really does strike me as p/a. Why post the opinion in the first place? I don't understand the split in the mindset between "I have strong opinions and want the world to know about them" and "I don't want anyone to know who I am."

But that's just my own mindset. I really don't get it.


Jessica - Feb 16, 2004 9:19:47 am PST #810 of 10002
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Anonymous reviews also don't get their email addresses harvested by spambots.


Betsy HP - Feb 16, 2004 9:21:32 am PST #811 of 10002
If I only had a brain...

is there any reason you can't use an pseud? The objection from me is to "a reader from...."

As far as I know, your only options are the full name Amazon knows you by or "a reader from...". I could be wrong.


erikaj - Feb 16, 2004 9:22:06 am PST #812 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

I'm piling up a shocking number of pseuds. "peaches" the fangirl, "chicating" for fanfic, and "Angela Frandina"(which I guess I could use on Amazon...and get even more e-mail saying "You don't really DO that, do you?" No. Hence the irony. Get it?


deborah grabien - Feb 16, 2004 9:23:02 am PST #813 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

Betsy, I have at least two obvious pseuds who have posted reviews of Weaver at Amazon; one good, one so-so. I have no problem with a pseud; I might even search and see what else they've reviewed.


Katie M - Feb 16, 2004 9:25:51 am PST #814 of 10002
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

I don't want thousands of strangers knowing my address either. But if I'm going to go to the trouble of writing and posting a review, it's presumably because I have a strong opinion about the work in question. And "a reader from a city in which there are eight million other readers and you'll never know who I am, neener" really does strike me as p/a. Why post the opinion in the first place? I don't understand the split in the mindset between "I have strong opinions and want the world to know about them" and "I don't want anyone to know who I am."

What's the difference between "A Reader From Seattle, Washington" and "Samantha Rodriguez From Seattle, Washington"? What value does "Samantha Rodriguez" add to the review?