Really? I love the twins (in small doses, which is how JKR uses them). And I think that Ron had his "going bad" moment back in GoF, where he got in that month-long snit over Harry being in the tournament. Unless, of course, she uses those brains he got mixed up with at the end of OotP as a device to make him wonky in the head. That'd be cool.
We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
I'm currently re-reading Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman. I suddenly realized that in my head, the character of Hunter is ita.
When I read it a couple years ago, she was Gina Torres, but ita would be an excellent Hunter.
Unless, of course, she uses those brains he got mixed up with at the end of OotP as a device to make him wonky in the head. That'd be cool.
I really hope this happens.
Some brief half-blood info from the book's editor. (See, it has one!)
Readers responded to Longmire's spoof romance covers and submitted some of their own.
Speaking of romance covers, it's time to vote in All About Romance's annual best and worst cover poll: [link]
Two that I nominated are in there--the one with the lovely lady archer under Alternate Reality and the great ghostly denim butt in the sky under Worst.
While there I went ahead and made a nomination for best of 2005: [link] Every bookstore I go in has that one facing cover-out, often displayed prominently near the front of the store. I'm sure that's mostly because Jo Beverley is a popular and well-established author, but I'm sure the man doesn't hurt.....
The Catholic Church came out with a statement that the faithful should not read or buy The DaVinci Code. I know it's silly and hardly a great work of literature, but you'd think a two-thousand-year-old institution would have figured out the principle of "attractive evil" by now. How many people who had been ignoring it are now going to say, "Huh, I wonder what's got them so het up about this?" Plus the dependable "It must be true or they wouldn't be worried!" crowd.
I'm sure the authors are horrified at all the news stories and fuss.
If only they'd said "Don't read it -- it's not very good."
Might have worked better.
Might have worked better.
Maybe they are trying reverse psychology along the lines of "So THIS is what the church has been banning all these years? I haven't been missing a thing."
If only they'd said "Don't read it -- it's not very good."
Might have worked better.
That did work on me. Not the church saying it (heaven forfend any church take that kind of interest in me), but y'know, literate people saying it was crap. That, and my natural anti-bandwagon defenses.