For me it was "fruit". I added an "e" to the end.
Apparently left-handed people are notoriously bad spellers, so I excuse it with genetics.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
For me it was "fruit". I added an "e" to the end.
Apparently left-handed people are notoriously bad spellers, so I excuse it with genetics.
I got to the citywide bee twice, and twice got stage fright and goofed on my very first word. Rabies (added an "i" after the "a" ) and department store (lost my place and left out the "-ment" altogether) were the words.
I'm an okay speller but a lousy typist, now.
Any readers have impressions of The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay to share? I bought it a couple weeks ago when I saw a copy on sale for a ridiculously low price, but I've since seen Spider-Man 2 and am beginning to regard reading Chabon as an obligatory homework project rather than something enjoyable in its own right.
I loved Kavalier and Clay. There were a few points were I thought the story dragged a little, but other than that, I thought it was great.
Loved it loved it. I could have done without the end, but I think I'm in the minority on that.
I thought it was great. It took a little while for me to get into, but I did.
It's a wonderful read, Matt. It'll suck you in and transport you to its world in a really satisfying way.
I read K&C in three days, Matt. Couldn't put it down, and chortled out loud in many places. It's a geek's geeky joyful novel. Except for the sad parts.
I didn't love it as much as I thought I might after everyone said "oh my God I love it!" But that was probably as much a reaction to hype as anything, and I did like it a lot, in a "wah how could you do that?" kind of way.
I was 100 pages into K&C when it won the Pulizter that year, and I felt very smart for having chosen it. But aside from that ego-boost, I did like it -- for its style, and the way it grasped after Big Things. I admired its narrative ambition, even when it felt a little cockamamie; and I like Josef and Sammy a great deal.
Also, it's just got that tone that feels very engaging to me, the way some people can invite you to a party and even if you don't know anybody there the hosts make you very comfortable. (I haven't found this is the case for all of Chabon's novels, or anyway it didn't work quite right in the short stuff of his I've read, and Summerland was more of a children's novel anyway.)