I see your uhhhhhhhhhhh and raise you a gnyeh.

Buffy ,'Potential'


We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good  

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


Micole - Jul 03, 2004 9:54:35 am PDT #4488 of 10002
I've been working on a song about the difference between analogy and metaphor.

And what does "an emphasis on language" mean except that more care and attention are paid to being well-written?

In this case, I meant a particular kind of language, although it's hard to define what. I don't mean style vs. content (which I agree is a division that falls apart after a while); I mean particular kind of style.

I do also think each era produces its own kind of generic High Literary Prose Style.

Like that.


Micole - Jul 03, 2004 9:56:06 am PDT #4489 of 10002
I've been working on a song about the difference between analogy and metaphor.

I'd also say genres like sf and mainstream are harder to define than things like romance, mystery, or Western, because the former are not as closely tied to specific conventions of plot or environment as the latter -- even though they may develop some typical tropes over time.


Strix - Jul 03, 2004 10:04:38 am PDT #4490 of 10002
A dress should be tight enough to show you're a woman but loose enough to flee from zombies. — Ginger

I fucking loved "Beloved." I re-read it every year -- the writing style, and the characterization is just so perfect to me. i don't feel that way about any other of Morrison's books, although I like several of them, but "Beloved" I adore.

Jilli, what about poetry? I'm thinking you need to read Christina Rossetti's "The Goblin Market."

I also agree about Atwood, and I love "Cat's Eye" for it's most accurate, unflinching look at the lives of girls that I have ever read. I would also say "Robber Bride" for the way that she looks at the way women have other relationships with women, both good and bad.

Neruda is already canon.

Allende? I love her, but I'm not sure about canon.

I propose Dorothy Allison, who gives wonderful looks at family relationships and all kinds of social commentary -- kind of modern Southern Gothic -- and in th most wonderful simple, elegant, evocative prose.


DavidS - Jul 03, 2004 10:08:24 am PDT #4491 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Allende? I love her, but I'm not sure about canon.

She feels a little squishy around the edges to me. t /exacting literary critical language. Maybe a little too eager to please.

I bet Jilli has already read "Goblin's Market" and all those decadent, juicy, mordant pre-Raphaelite poets.

Fair point about Morrison and Kincaid, Sophia. I do think something like Beloved is likely to still be read fifty years from now. Whereas Walker's subordination of fiction to immediate political concerns is going to read like a very earnest, boring, preachy abolitionist novel from the 1850s.


Strix - Jul 03, 2004 10:12:38 am PDT #4492 of 10002
A dress should be tight enough to show you're a woman but loose enough to flee from zombies. — Ginger

I agree about Walker. I like several of her earlier books, and they introduced several interesting and new topics for me to thnk about in college -- but as far as style, and longvegity, I don't think she really has the same impact or grace.

GM is such a creepy poem. I love to read it in the fall.

I read Neruda to myself, tucked into bed at night. I read it in the Spanish first (which I totally don't understand) just for the rythem, and then in the English, for the images and different rythem.

Besides, the guy wrote an ode to a lemon. How can I not love him?!


Sophia Brooks - Jul 03, 2004 10:17:36 am PDT #4493 of 10002
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Whereas Walker's subordination of fiction to immediate political concerns is going to read like a very earnest, boring, preachy abolitionist novel from the 1850s.

OK-- I am starting to agree with you. I just tend to have a fondness for things that don't age well-- in what they can tell us about then. The Jungle or Maggie, Girl of the Streets or Daisy Miller come off in the same ay to me but I still think it has a place.


Atropa - Jul 03, 2004 10:41:21 am PDT #4494 of 10002
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

However, Jilli reminds me I want to dig out SWTWC again. It's a shame the movie wasn't better, because the casting was impeccable, IMO.

The movie could have been better if they had decided not to go for cheap scare tactics by changing the Dust Witch into Queen of the Spiders. Gaaaah!

I bet Jilli has already read "Goblin's Market" and all those decadent, juicy, mordant pre-Raphaelite poets.

Luuuuuurve "Goblin's Market". In fact, I saw a kick-ass stage production based on it. However, I will admit that I haven't read a *lot* of poetry; most of my teachers picked not very interesting-to-me poems and then proceeded to do a horrible hack & slash job of explaining why we should admire it.


JZ - Jul 03, 2004 11:02:56 am PDT #4495 of 10002
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.

Quick little notes:

  • Just started rereading
Moby Dick. So far, up to Father Mapple's sermon ("Beloved shipmates, clinch the last verse of the first chapter of Jonah" -- heee!). Very, very happy so far.

  • P-C has inspired me to give Faulkner another go, which is something that up until two days ago I would've sworn on a stack of the collected sacred texts of every culture on the planet I'd never, never do. Hec promises he'll find me something less impenetrable than "The Bear," and possibly a mid-50s edition of something with a nice pulp fiction cover, to make it less frightening.

  • Canon? Like others here, I'm not so sure about Walker, but quite sure about Toni Morrison; I'm ashamed to admit that
Handmaid's Tale is the only Atwood I've ever read, and now I feel very urgently that I need more; and I think Gloria Naylor has a shot at canon, possibly, depending on what she puts out over the next few years. Mama Day is the one of hers that I'd lovingly and urgently pimp to anyone, anytime, ever. So lovely and intelligent and deeply felt, and such a rich and marvelous job of worldbuilding.


Dani - Jul 03, 2004 11:06:15 am PDT #4496 of 10002
I believe vampires are the world's greatest golfers

I tend to put Surfacing in because of the way it deals with gender and identity. In some respects, I feel it is the most "Canadian" of her novels

To me that's why Surfacing will not be the canonical Atwood book; because she was consciously trying to write the Great Canadian Novel it's not universal enough. I'd plump for Cat's Eye along with everyone else, although Alias Grace might come close.


Lyra Jane - Jul 03, 2004 11:27:02 am PDT #4497 of 10002
Up with the sun

I know I've readSurfacing, but my pick for canonical Atwood would be either Cat's Eye or The Robber Bride does. Cat's Eye is closest to the bone, but the language in The Riobber Bride sticks with me endlessly.

As for Irving, I read it all in high school. I think Owen Meaney and Garp were my favorites. (I still haven't read A Widow forOne Year, though)

Still, I could see this book, and possibly the sequels, being taught in English classes 20 years from now.

I think it's an excellent snapshot of the era, and in a way Maupin is a modern Dickens. I'm not sure it will be taught, but I hope it will be read.

And I went to the library today! Got The Things They Carried, Augusten Burrough's Dry, and The Good Soldier by Ford Madox Ford because the idea of a completely unreliablenarrator fascinates me.