our bookclub just selected The Night Inspector by Frederick Busch. Anyone read it and have thoughts?

You know, I'm pretty sure I own it, think I have read it, and yet remember nothing. But that's nothing against the book -- I'm terrible with that.

oh, can you see if you have it? so I can borrow? asuming you're ok to lend it. t /presumptious.

Of course.

Gaudy Night, and GN alone, is one of the recommended book club books through the Seattle Public Library's Center for the Book, which keeps a stock of various Important Works to loan out to area book clubs. One of my coworkers in the brief time I worked at SPL mentioned that they were going to read it next. I asked her if she'd read any of the previous Lord Peter books, and she said no. While I don't think it's necessary to have read everything that's gone before to appreciate it, I can't imagine the book is enhanced by having to plunge straight in without any history of who Peter and Harriet are and why should we care.

One thing with Gaudy Night is that it's really not a mystery, to me. The anonymous letters etc. are a non-starter for me as a crisis, because being me here in the 21st century, I'm just "ignore the twit already. Can anyone really take someone like this seriously?" I don't see a threat, I see an expensive annoyance.

The book primarily strikes me as story of women in what is considered at the time an "unnatural" environment. 70 years later, the crisis there is minimal to me as well. If someone was wanting to be introduced to Sayers, I would give them "Murder Must Advertise".

One thing with Gaudy Night is that it's really not a mystery, to me.

The book primarily strikes me as story of women in what is considered at the time an "unnatural" environment.

Which I presume is why it, and it alone, makes the book club recommended reading list.

t insert standard Susan W. genre rant here

Yeah, the story in Gaudy Night is really just a dopey little backdrop, sort of a dressmaker's dummy, on which to hang the Courtship of Harriet.

I just have fun with her placement of things around the city.

But Advertise is brilliant. And yes, Nine Tailors is also very cool, with the fen country and the campanology and everything.

Gosh, campanology. I just skim those sections and nod and say "Mystic art, not for the unitiated."

I like Nine Tailors slightly better than Advertise, but it's a microscopic difference. Having worked layout, the description in Advertise of a layout person being a beast of burden caught between the artists and copywriters resonated with me. But Nine Tailors has the whole land and water thing, which, as someone who grew up on land "reclaimed" from a swamp, also resonated with me. I think that Nine Tailors wins because I like the actual mystery best.

I tend to read Gaudy Night as a romance with mystery bits, rather than as a mystery. I believe that the whole idea of women in Oxford was barely a generation old at the time, and such men as had made it back from the war might have liked some of those higher education slots, so I can see where the female deans would have worried about any possible threat to their school's reputation.

I love Gaudy Night so much I can't be rational about it. I care about the mystery only so far as it weaves in with Harriet and Peter's story, and I think it does so beautifully.