Can't any one of your damn little Scooby club at least try to remember that I hate you all?

Spike ,'Get It Done'


We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good  

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


Micole - Apr 21, 2004 3:54:56 am PDT #2301 of 10002
I've been working on a song about the difference between analogy and metaphor.

Katherine Blake (aka Dorothy Heydt)'s Interior Life uses different fonts for its main storyline about a 70s Berkeley housewife, the fantastical quest world she is either imagining or psychically linked to, and for [spoiler]. I think it adds a lot to the book, not least allowing her to shift from character/world to character/world mid-sentence, which gives a sense of the worlds interpenetrating and affecting each other while still being understandable.

I'm also fine with different fonts used to indicate letters, newspaper articles, telegrams, etc., especially in "false document" narratives. (I still think the larger category should have a cool name, like "epistolary novel," damnit.)

Aside from that, not so much. And I HATE funky ink colors with a passion. Black is default; I don't notice it; I notice the words. Other colors distract me.


Steph L. - Apr 21, 2004 4:03:21 am PDT #2302 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I really hate reading anything longer than a few words in italics. It screws up the shapes of the words and makes it take twice as long to read. There have been a whole bunch of books that everyone tells me are great, that I just haven't read because they've got pages on end in italics, and I know I wouldn't be able to read it.

I think the fact that Owen's dialogue was all in ASSCAPS is a big part of what made me dislike A Prayer for Owen Meany.


Lilty Cash - Apr 21, 2004 4:22:27 am PDT #2303 of 10002
"You see? THAT's what they want. Love, and a bit with a dog."

That's the thing- until now she's been a perfectly enjoyable writer. I finished the book, and while its not my favorite, its decent. There was no need to resort to gimmicks. She showcased her astonishing font trick for a brief segment near the end, with each character getting a page, talking about how its raining (yeah, it wasn't great.) The font changes so quickly there it is IMPOSSIBLE not to notice. It's like the book is standing up on a chair, waving its arms at me, saying "Look! I'm clever!".


deborah grabien - Apr 21, 2004 7:04:22 am PDT #2304 of 10002
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

I think it adds a lot to the book, not least allowing her to shift from character/world to character/world mid-sentence, which gives a sense of the worlds interpenetrating and affecting each other while still being understandable.

Yep. When you're dealing with the fantastic, some separation is needed. And in those circs, I think it not only helps the story, but is necessary.

But totally with Micole, on the otherwise, not so much thing.


Jess M. - Apr 21, 2004 7:36:05 am PDT #2305 of 10002
Let me just say that popularity with people on public transportation does not equal literary respect. --Jesse

I finished Oryx and Crake last night, by Margaret Atwood. I found it a really interesting book. Anyone else read it? I generally like her novels (I think I've read 4 or 5). This one is much more like The Handmaid's Tale then The Blind Assassin or Alias Grace.


Java cat - Apr 21, 2004 9:43:44 am PDT #2306 of 10002
Not javachik

I listened to Oryx and Crake on books on tape and loved it. It reminded me of A Brave New World more than The Handmaid's Tale. Handmaid's Tale was distressing, in the same way A Thousand Acres was distressing. It left me feel wrung out and disturbed, and in the case of HT, really, really angry. O&C on the other hand, and BNW for that matter, just made me think and the stories were enjoyable to read. Does that make sense?

eta: I've been thinking of reading another of Atwood's books. What do you recommend? Something more like O&C and not like HT, please.


Jesse - Apr 21, 2004 9:48:34 am PDT #2307 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Oh, god. A Thousand Acres slayed me. It probably didn't help that I didn't know anything about it, and had only read (I think) Moo by the same author, so I was not prepared AT ALL.


Dani - Apr 21, 2004 9:51:47 am PDT #2308 of 10002
I believe vampires are the world's greatest golfers

My favourite Atwood is and probably always will be Cat's Eye. It's not one of her dystopian books, but it deals with children's cruelty to each other, so if that's a hotbutton issue for you you might not enjoy it. (Personally I think that's one of the reasons I love it so much - it's like picking at a scab, painful but irresistible.)


Lilty Cash - Apr 21, 2004 9:52:31 am PDT #2309 of 10002
"You see? THAT's what they want. Love, and a bit with a dog."

I've seen A Thousand Acres a few places used and meant to grab it but never did. Then one time I tivo'd the movie and forgot to watch it. I probably ought to just go ahead and read it, huh?


Katerina Bee - Apr 21, 2004 9:55:34 am PDT #2310 of 10002
Herding cats for fun

I haven't read Oryx and Crake yet, so cannot compare. I did quite like Alias Grace, especially when she has to talk to the investigator and he asks her what her typical day of work as a lower servant is like. She sits there thinking, get up at dawn, start fire, carry water, assemble breakfast, deliver breakfast, empty slops, gather laundry, get more wood, stoke the fire, boil the water, stir the laundry... hadn't this man ever noticed all the effort of keeping house going on all around him?