We're Literary 2: To Read Makes Our Speaking English Good
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
I have reread all of Sherlock Holmes probably 15 times. I'm thinking about doing it again.
I do have a Sherlock Holmes story. I have an unusual last name. When I was in an English graduate seminar, someone asked what kind of name it was. I said my great-grandfather had come from Bohemia. One student gasped and said, "A Scandal in Bohemia. I thought that was a made-up country."
There is a Peter Wimsey mystery (sans Harriet Vane) that pulls this about three chapters in,
It's Five Red Herrings, and it's generally admitted as one of the weakest, since it's basically Sayers' attempt to write a mystery that depends on train timetables and all that boring shit.
Ginger, the woman I did the reading with this past Saturday - Lora Roberts - writes Holmes pastiches. She does a quite decent job, too.
The thing about The Five Red Herrings is, when you get to the end and realize what the question was, it really is a completely obvious thing that any 12 year old might have asked. I find that FRH is not my favorite Sayers by any means, but the recreation of the crime/coverup is hilarious.
One student gasped and said, "A Scandal in Bohemia. I thought that was a made-up country."
Hee! OK, sad, but still. Heh.
My love for Sherlock Holmes goes beyond the platonic, that's for sure. I got a leather-bound complete Holmes collection as a high school graduation gift and read through it several times the summer after graduation. It's probably the only HS grad. gift I still have, lo these 20 years later.
I have a friend who went trick-or-treating, our senior year of high school, as Sherlock Holmes. She looked really cool, I have to admit.
Oh, my. Remember our nice long heated debate on Amazon.com reviews?
From today's L.A. Times.
Why yes, Virginia, your career can depend entirely on whether or not four people who didn't like you in high school want to get bitchy.
BTW, Caroline Leavitt, who's mentioned in the article, is out there spreading the Wonderfalls gospel. She's a damned good writer, too.
Now that I've seen
Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back,
I can't even take
my
opinions on the web seriously.
It's also an argument for anonymity.
For the reviewer, sure. For the author, who may spot personal attacks and have no defense, not so much.
Being the author, I'm in the second camp. But really, what's exercising my brain about the article is the fact that enough reviews by nineteen-year-old virgins who want "more romance!" or "more sex!" in a book can influence an editor.
Which makes me want to vomit, and kill people.
Being the author, and all.
Being a sometime professional reviewer, the one thing that this does bring is the decline of the profession. I think there will always be big-time reviewers, don't get me wrong, but the little ones (like me) will soon find themselves out of jobs/hobbies.
I actually think it's a good thing for two reasons: 1) Now the people reading the books actually get to tell the author they think the book is fabulous even if the NY Times said it's worthless, and 2) It adds checks and balances to a system that has created famous crap authors (Danielle Steele, anyone?) and ruined fantastic authors with just a couple of reviews. There is still a lot of bugs that need to be worked out before it's close to flawless, but I say it's much better than the system we have in place now.