Can stompies see who we're filtering? Can stompies be filtered? I think the admin login should be exempt from filtering, at any rate.
Am I being a jerkface-making-things-complex?
'Sleeper'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Can stompies see who we're filtering? Can stompies be filtered? I think the admin login should be exempt from filtering, at any rate.
Am I being a jerkface-making-things-complex?
It does now.
OMG, you guys are fancy. That was seriously a mostly-idle question.
I agree that admins cannot be filterable.
Also agree that you guys RAWK. Just FTR.
Bless. You. All!
t starts compiling MARCIE list
I think admins should be filterable.
Shouldn't be allowed to filter, though. Not that that needs to be in code.
However, user id 1, "admin" should be unfilterable.
I'm looking forward to seeing how the MARCIE filter works. Personally, I can't think of anyone I'd want to put on full-time MARCIE, but there might be times I'd use it when three or four people are conducting a conversation I'd prefer not to read.
However, user id 1, "admin" should be unfilterable.
Done.
Rob - I think the threadsuck should have the option of blocking or not blocking. It should be a checkbox like the "mark as read" thingie.
Sounds good. It's more than a one-line change, though, so it will have to wait until I've got a few hours to dedicate to the task.
I was going to offer to code the threadsuck before you got all showoff-ey. :P
I wouldn't have time until this weekend at the earliest, so go for it if you have time before then.