I mentioned it over on BBaBB, but I don't know if the discussion came over here.

I think it's a significant change for lurkers, and I'm not sure that the benefit will be strong enough to counter that.

But then again, how the heck does it tell anyone anything besides that a name is taken.

I think it's more a question of feelings than anything concrete. I just think that people who like being invisible might suddenly feel like they're being dragged into the light, which is kind of alarming.

I mentioned it over on BBaBB, but I don't know if the discussion came over here.

Thanks. I'll go reread.

It's one thing to know that active posters are only about 20% of the board population, but it's another thing entirely to see the proof.

Hunh. I had the opposite thought -- it seemed to me like I recognized about 80% of the usernames.

Also, if you look at the bottom of the screen, Gus built it from people who had posted in recently-closed threads. Total lurkers aren't on there.

I don't like the idea of a users list being available to non-members. IIRC, optimizing and re-activating the search function is already on the tech To Do list, so it's not really policy issue, is it?

I prefer pronounceable usernames, but it's not something I think needs to be codified.

And (to add to the confusion), I'd like to change my username (back) to Jessica, if there's a Stompy around to do it.

Done, Jess.

eta:

IIRC, optimizing and re-activating the search function is already on the tech To Do list, so it's not really policy issue, is it?

True, but I was specifically thinking of a user search rather than a content search -- in other words, "take me to the profile of poster x", rather than "show me all that poster y posted".

It seems like a distinct function to me, although I'd be interested to know if others don't see it that way. And I don't know if the load would be significantly less than the old search function, or even where we are on that right now, so the suggestion is subject to all kinds of caveats.

I think it's more a question of feelings than anything concrete. I just think that people who like being invisible might suddenly feel like they're being dragged into the light, which is kind of alarming.

Betcha even money more of them will look at the list, find their name and go, "Look! My name!"and move on with nary a thought.

Not trying to be facetious, but we can't cater to the most neurotic, and we can't cater to hypothetical feelings.

Also, if you look at the bottom of the screen, Gus built it from people who had posted in recently-closed threads. Total lurkers aren't on there.

That's where the 20% number comes from, LJ -- there are about 300 names on that list, and about 1300 registered users.

[Thanks, Amych. Off to change the tag now...]

And (to add to the confusion), I'd like to change my username (back) to Jessica, if there's a Stompy around to do it.

To subtract from my confusion, you're PMoon, yes?

eta... damn, too slow again. I need my own little time warp thingie.

Question about Aimee's ballot...

When we were going through all the set up, there was talk about what to do, if a ballot fell over a holiday, etc. I don't know how many people will be absent over Passover. I do know Wolfram is one, and expressed interest in the vote. When we had our discussions, did we ever decide to make accomodations for holidays, etc., or did we just talk about it, but not arrive at a conclusion.

Gah! All these people changing their names! Chaos! Confusion! Brain hurt!

I take my stand now: I will always ALWAYS be Miracleman!

...unless...Well, being called Captain Marvel would be cool...

...or Mister Mind. Or Dr. Sivana, what with the monkeys and zombies...ooh! Gargunza!

...make the bad thoughts stop...

t /natter