Angel: Miss me? Lilah: Only in the sense of…no.

'Just Rewards (2)'


Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


JenP - Mar 22, 2004 11:12:42 am PST #7643 of 10005

Fair, though I'd also note that Elena voluntarily pulled the DM notices,

Yes, she did.

and there seems to be community pressure not to be frivolous with the attention granted.

Not to be frivolous with the attention granted to posts in Press -- yes, and I'd add that there's some disagreement re: what frivolous/inappropriate is. As to specific types of posts, even though some are viewed less favorably than others, it's still a matter of personal judgement. So, taking into account that post X may bug some people, a poster still decides if reason's Y and Z outweigh that or don't outweigh it for a particular post.

At this point?

(And, the Stompies regulate natter, etc. in the specialized threads, and I'm assuming there's some latitude for them to judge and delete or repost somewhere else any, you know, wildly inappropriately placed posts, so there's that mechanism, too.)


Miracleman - Mar 22, 2004 12:04:00 pm PST #7644 of 10005
No, I don't think I will - me, quoting Captain Steve Rogers, to all of 2020

Wh--there's a Press thread?


Dana - Mar 22, 2004 12:06:41 pm PST #7645 of 10005
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

You're the reason we can't have nice threads.


DavidS - Mar 22, 2004 12:08:15 pm PST #7646 of 10005
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Wh--there's a Press thread?

You and you alone have been blocked from seeing it.


Miracleman - Mar 22, 2004 12:09:13 pm PST #7647 of 10005
No, I don't think I will - me, quoting Captain Steve Rogers, to all of 2020

You and you alone have been blocked from seeing it.

Whew. Thanks.


bon bon - Mar 22, 2004 12:09:20 pm PST #7648 of 10005
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

would Bob mind if I married your brain?

I don't think that's allowed in this state, but I'll check it out.


Wolfram - Mar 22, 2004 1:04:38 pm PST #7649 of 10005
Visilurking

I don't think partial-person marriages have been legislated in my state. YSMV.


amych - Mar 22, 2004 1:05:51 pm PST #7650 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

What about mixed parts from different sources? Does it still count as polygamy if it's less than or equal to one whole person? t /natter


DXMachina - Mar 22, 2004 1:23:18 pm PST #7651 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

What about mixed parts from different sources? Does it still count as polygamy if it's less than or equal to one whole person?

Isn't that the central question in The Bride of Frankenstein?

Well it should've been...


Elena - Mar 22, 2004 1:30:36 pm PST #7652 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.

'Voluntary' is accurate in that there was no vote, and no official board notification that I should stop posting dm notices in Press, but I did feel pressured to stop doing something that, in my view, was not against board policy.

That the method I'm using now works is great - but if it hadn't, we certainly would have had to had some kind of official decision on what belongs in Press.