Let me clarify, I was meaning "There's Just One Catch"...I guess I just did shorthand.
'Lineage'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Right then. "There's a catch" grabs me, because there are at least 22 catches, so "there's just one catch" doesn't work for me.
Well, it is catchy....
Well, it is catchy...
Natter 22: Hey, that's catchy.
IJS
Okay, let's not screw up Natter 22 like we did Natter 21. Stick with Natter 22: There's just one catch....
We screwed up Natter 21?
Well, I just like The House Always Wins, which obviously lost. Okay, just got the irony there.
Right. Simple is good. In the year 2075, ACMM 21 can be The House Always Wins.
For now, 'There's a catch ...' seems the best bet from where I'm sitting. And even though 'Oh well, what the hell' just occurred to me, I'm most definitely not submitting it for consideration. So there.
Natter 22: There's just one catch... works for me.
Natter 22: There's just one catch
I like this, too.