Is there chocolate cake in the cafeteria?

I think it's raisins.

If we name a thread after someone (not just an instance, but the whole thing) do they get to rule it?

The board's a co-op. For better or worse, we da ppl roolz!

He's a smart cookie, he'll go where the discussion goes.

I think it's raisins.

Rassenfrassen ferrets.

Is there a problem with Wonderfalls talk being in the Minearverse?

It is a NAFDA thread. I don't really care either way, I think the main problem is just organizing things neatly.

I don't really care either way, I think the main problem is just organizing things neatly.

This is my thought too. That, and people who don't know about the Minearverse thread not knowing where to discuss Wonderfalls. I don't want a new thread, but I do think changing the subtitle to something Falls-specific and posting a notice in press as to where show discussion goes might be good ideas.

Or, you know, we could not.

I know we had some discussion about this way back when, but I don't remember and don't want to go back to look.

My thought is that I'd prefer to keep the number of threads that Tim has to keep track of to a minimum. So I'd say keep it in Minearverse on that basis alone. Otherwise I'm good with whatever we do.

Keep it in Minearverse and change some of the slug to provide clearer directions?

Something along the lines of "... the collective works of Tim Minear (i.e. Wonderfalls)..."

I wonder wonder why the wonder falls....

I'm all for a new slug--that way if things get off topic (and when don't they?) they will still be on topic.

How about:

Discussion of the collective works of Tim Minear. Wonderfalls included. Beagles optional.

Discussion of the collective works of Tim Minear. Wonderfalls included. Beagles optional.

Sounds good to me. I think this just needs a slug adjustment.

adjusts own slug in sympathy.