Using it as a verb works better for me. As a noun, I can't make it not offensive.
Buffy ,'Showtime'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
All snark aside, seems like spaz is no worse than "dumb". After all, all pejorative words have negative etymologies. We have any actual empirical evidence of offense? I wouldn't have connected spastic to CP without explicit help.
I had no idea it was considered offensive. And I didn't want to admit that at first, because I was afraid that would have revealed that I was an asshat of the first order who insults as many groups as possible.
Maybe it's the US/UK difference.
But I don't remember anyone being offended by its use in the show.
In any case, I don't participate in the deathmatches, so I actually don't care what the title is.
And I do have a related Deathmatch question that I have to admit I'm afraid is going to get me yelled at: now that the Deathmatches have been running for a while, and the people who participate are in all likelihood subscribed to the thread, do there still need to be announcements made in Press every time a new round starts up?
I'm more or less with ita on this. It's closely tied to its origins in Australia too (so while being a mild insult to the person at which it's directed, its use is substantially more offensive to people with cerebral palsy). Using it as a verb does mitigate this to me.
And I do have a related Deathmatch question that I have to admit I'm afraid is going to get me yelled at: now that the Deathmatches have been running for a while, and the people who participate are in all likelihood subscribed to the thread, do there still need to be announcements made in Press every time a new round starts up?
I don't know why you would think that it would get you yelled at, and I'm sorry you no longer participate in the deathmatches, but is it problematic in some way to have the announcements in Press? If it is, I can certainly refrain.
I like having the announcements in Press. I can't keep up with all the deathmatches, but it gives a quick way to go in and participate in one or two when I can.
I like having hte announcements here. Press comes up before the Deathmatches in my Read New list.
Press comes up before the Deathmatches in my Read New list.
That's not hardcoded, for the record. It depends on what has the newest messages.
I like having the announcements in Press. I can't keep up with all the deathmatches, but it gives a quick way to go in and participate in one or two when I can.
I'm with Hil. I usually pop in for a vote or two when I see it in Press, but otherwise I've had to unsubscribe.
It does? I guess I didn't notice, I thought it was the order in which they appear in my subscription list. Oh, well, never mind, I still like having the announcements.
That's odd, ita. My message center works that way, but not Read New. When I hit "Read New," I usually get threads in roughly the order they were created.
Not that it causes a problem for me, but I don't know enough about the subject to know whether there may be a problem in the system.