I'm a slacker, you're a slacker, who's a slacker too?
I'm just waiting to see if I pass out. Long story.
Mal ,'Heart Of Gold'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
bon bon - Nov 10, 2003 10:42:48 am PST #5752 of 10005
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
DXMachina - Nov 10, 2003 10:55:18 am PST #5753 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Not me...
Nilly - Nov 11, 2003 4:01:46 am PST #5754 of 10005
Swouncing
According to Dani "Sunnydale Press" Nov 10, 2003 1:18:59 pm PST :
I've decided to just declare an arbitrary cutoff and pass any more names on to Nilly.
I got no names at all, so I don't think anyone has been missed. I've e-mailed Dani and will post in Press once I know exactly what's going on.
I'm deeply sorry for the confusion.
Wolfram - Nov 17, 2003 9:04:30 am PST #5755 of 10005
Visilurking
Related to nothing, I just found out some really delicious Angel casting spoiler news and I realized that I have no safe harbor to disseminate it and discuss it without being exposed to hard core spoilers. My question really is, when can we propose to re-open the sadly defunct spoilage light thread?
Please note, this is not a proposal. I just wondered if someone could give me the exact date, under the current rules, when we could discuss opening the thread again.
ETA: After a quick glance at Voting, it looks like we closed the thread around August 24, 2003. So is it February 24, 2004 that we can first propose a reopening?
And as a follow-up question, is there anywhere else, other than Angel Spoilers, that we can discuss Angel casting spoilers, maybe in whitefont?
§ ita § - Nov 17, 2003 9:30:34 am PST #5756 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
as a follow-up question, is there anywhere else, other than Angel Spoilers, that we can discuss Angel casting spoilers, maybe in whitefont?
Nope, not with the non-existence of Lite.
Wolfram - Nov 17, 2003 10:09:26 am PST #5757 of 10005
Visilurking
Thanks ita. That's what I figured but I wanted to be sure.
dang.
Cindy - Nov 17, 2003 11:13:32 am PST #5758 of 10005
Nobody
Wolfram, do you want the spoiler confirmed, or did you just want to talk about it?
For what it's worth, the last 10 posts in spoilers have been:
- bitching about politics and work
- mention of casting spoiler for an upcoming episode (no details, just the actors' identities)
- Discussion on whether or not the series will get picked up for a 6th season
- Whether or not Kristin (of E! online -- formerly Wanda) is accurate
The last post is here: Lyra Jane "Angel SPOILERS" Nov 15, 2003 5:20:06 pm PST
If you click that, you'll be taken to (at least as of now) the last post in the thread, and you can post your stuff. Hope this helps as a work around. However, spoils can and do come in when they come--caveat lector.
Wolfram - Nov 17, 2003 11:16:10 am PST #5759 of 10005
Visilurking
Wolfram, do you want the spoiler confirmed, or did you just want to talk about it?
Just wanted to talk about it. Thanks for the sum up and link, but I'm too chicken to even pop into the thread. I'll live. ;)
jengod - Nov 18, 2003 8:19:14 am PST #5760 of 10005
I know everybody else knows this already, but AICN linked to here on Sunday, so if there's a random visitors spike (not Spike), that's probably one reason:
Warning: Spoilers behind this link! [link]
Lyra Jane - Nov 18, 2003 8:21:53 am PST #5761 of 10005
Up with the sun
Hadn't seen that before but we knew it was linked at Whedonesque. There should probably be a spoiler warning on that link.