Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass.

Cordelia ,'Dirty Girls'


Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


DXMachina - Sep 05, 2003 2:54:46 am PDT #5066 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

1. In the PPO/Bitchy Fic consolidation combine and rename to Bitchy Fic.

I think the original plan was that Bitchy Fic would continue as the combined thread (to provide continuity for any multi-part fics), and that we would close the other two and fold them into Bitchy Fic. So we close PPO and Pornanthology, and change the slug and description of Bitchy Fic to reflect that.


Lyra Jane - Sep 05, 2003 3:31:41 am PDT #5067 of 10005
Up with the sun

I thought the PPO/Bitchy Fic combo was just being called Bitchy Fic?

I thought we had said we'd rename Bitchy fic Buffista Fic to reflect the less Spikecentric focus. That would be my preference, but not an extremely strong one.

Thanks for the list, ita.


Cindy - Sep 05, 2003 3:57:37 am PDT #5068 of 10005
Nobody

I thought we had said we'd rename Bitchy fic Buffista Fic to reflect the less Spikecentric focus. That would be my preference, but not an extremely strong one.

I remember this as what Plei suggested, but am too lazy to threadsuck and confirm.


§ ita § - Sep 05, 2003 4:03:28 am PDT #5069 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm for taking a bit of the Bitch out, too.


Kat - Sep 05, 2003 5:21:15 am PDT #5070 of 10005
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Okay, so closing PPO/Anthology and renaming Bitchy Fic to Buffista Fic sounds good to me.

And DS/FS/SV?


Dana - Sep 05, 2003 5:24:37 am PDT #5071 of 10005
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

DS/FS/SV?

I'd try to post a last nudge in those threads and get the inhabitants to weigh in. Someone who is not currently working on the FAQ (i.e., not me) could page back and gather the most popular suggestions proposed.


Nutty - Sep 05, 2003 5:43:28 am PDT #5072 of 10005
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

FS/SV/DS -- We were playing around with

Boxed Set: ______.

(2nd thread to be called Boxed Set Vol. 2: _____.) The first Boxed Set subtitle was going to be something like "Farscape, Smallville, Due South, Yay!" and then a slug involving the phrase "TV Fandom", or vice versa.

And it taught me the word "passim." (I thought Nilly said it meant bubblewrap! :)

Passim = Latin, I think. It means "and this other stuff I am too tired to point out specifically, but is right near that other stuff I already pointed out". Mostly, in the Lawspeak, I did it to reference conversations that had hashed out an idea, but the idea had not been restated by a single person.

There are links to (all but the recent) vote outcomes in the Lawspeak now. (I think they're to the Press announcement.)


DXMachina - Sep 05, 2003 5:46:36 am PDT #5073 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

From way back, here was where we were before we got side tracked by other stuff.

Boxed Set 1: Farscape, Smallville, Due South, et al.

A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much anything else that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.

There were a couple of objections to "et al." as promoting thread drift, but my feeling is that the thread is going to drift regardless, plus we're in much better shape with regards to server load than we were, so we may as well be honest about it. Besides, naming every single show we talk about in there would make the thread title very long...

x-posted with Nutty.


§ ita § - Sep 05, 2003 6:01:29 am PDT #5074 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

my feeling is that the thread is going to drift regardless, plus we're in much better shape with regards to server load than we were, so we may as well be honest about it

We're in better shape, but I'm queasing at the idea that we're perceived as in better enough shape to shrug at a de facto general TV thread.


Katie M - Sep 05, 2003 6:06:29 am PDT #5075 of 10005
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

We're in better shape, but I'm queasing at the idea that we're perceived as in better enough shape to shrug at a de facto general TV thread.

Okay, so, Pros and Cons of the et al.!

Pros:

Latin is cool
People will know to look for things like Stargate discussion in Boxed Set
It's honest

Cons: People will start things like Stargate discussion in Boxed Set (well, it's a bit late for that one)

Really that's about it, as far as I can see. I'm happy to drop it if it makes people involved in the nitty-gritty of board-running nervous. I mean, I already know that it's the de facto Fannish TV thread, so I don't need the pointer.