Correct.
eta: In fact, now that I look at it, even the quote on the Archives page has been static since day one, so as near as I can tell, it never made any calls to the database at all.
Gunn: You saying popping mama threw you a beating? Lorne: Kid Vicious did the heavy lifting. Cordy just mwah-ha-ha'd at us.
'Underneath'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
DXMachina - Aug 20, 2003 6:24:35 pm PDT #4395 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Elena - Aug 20, 2003 6:28:06 pm PDT #4396 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.
Okay. Anything I can do to help with the archiving of closed threads?
Kristen - Aug 20, 2003 6:28:16 pm PDT #4397 of 10005
In July, this site used about 20 GB of bandwidth. You have 36 GB. So far this month, you've used almost 12 GB.
Also, bandwidth is an easy fix. You can always buy more. Resources NSM.
DXMachina - Aug 20, 2003 6:30:07 pm PDT #4398 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Anything I can do to help with the archiving of closed threads?
Thanks for offering, but not really.
Allyson - Aug 20, 2003 6:31:04 pm PDT #4399 of 10005
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
DX, given that, why not move ALL closed threads off this board? Leave them up for ONE WEEK, no more than that. Then we put the in "The Attic."
We could have them hosted by Fangeek, at a pretty minimal price (I know da owners, I'll haggle). That should lighten the "click through" load on the server, substantially. The threads would be available for read only, just not on this board.
They don't have to be here.
Jessica - Aug 20, 2003 6:33:46 pm PDT #4400 of 10005
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Of the 1000 registered users, 180 posted in the first 10 days of August. This doesn't indicate how many lurked, and how many unregistered posters read.
So, having 100 users hitting either "post" or "read new" at the same time isn't so far fetched. That's not good news.
Jessica - Aug 20, 2003 6:34:56 pm PDT #4401 of 10005
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
They don't have to be here.
The zipped & archived threads aren't in the database anyway, though. They're not causing any problems, AFAIK.
Allyson - Aug 20, 2003 6:38:00 pm PDT #4402 of 10005
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
There's 15 closed threads on the board.
Jessica - Aug 20, 2003 6:40:06 pm PDT #4403 of 10005
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
They're in the process of being archived. DX is working on it.
DXMachina - Aug 20, 2003 6:41:56 pm PDT #4404 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
We can do that, but it takes a few hours apiece to go through them and get them into shape for archiving, and you need to be a stompy to do the required editing. For example, a long URL is only a minor inconvenience when encountered in a thread, because you just go to the next page and the page width goes back to normal, but if it's allowed to stay in the archived file, the whole file is going to be a royal pain to read.
To be honest, I don't think the closed threads are that much of a drain on resources. They take up room in the database, but I suspect those posts aren't accessed that much. It would be different if the search function was still active, and people were constantly running searches on all the threads, but search is disabled.
The resources are being used mostly to read and post in the active threads, and to update the message center.