means that we could have talked about MT coming onto Buffy, but could not have talked about ASH leaving. Right?
Since ASH's departure from the main cast was announced over the summer, it could have been talked about under these rules.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
means that we could have talked about MT coming onto Buffy, but could not have talked about ASH leaving. Right?
Since ASH's departure from the main cast was announced over the summer, it could have been talked about under these rules.
Okay, the reason I had suggested using the upfronts was because it was clear. There's no confusion then about what's official. I feel like announcements is fuzzy. But I guess that ship has sailed.
We could have talked about MT joining the cast, but we couldn't have revealed who/what her character would be. Is that correct?
We could have talked about MT joining the cast, but we couldn't have revealed who/what her character would be. Is that correct?
That's my understanding.
We could have talked about MT joining the cast, but we couldn't have revealed who/what her character would be. Is that correct?
This is my understanding.
2) Given that we tend to rely on intent over strict interpetation of language. And we tend favor common sense over intent.
Have you and I been following the same discussion?
t /brat
Jess, that's a spooky X-post.
Talk about your xposty goodness. I love when that happens. And yes, that would be my understanding too.
And the same thing happened yesterday w/ JZ. GET OUT OF MY BRAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Given the topic of the x-post shouldn't that be "get out, Get Out, GET OUT!!!!"