Do we know for sure that the casting spoilers for Angel 5 will be made clear before Ep 1 airs?
We've seen the official posters that are going to be released, so I think it is certain that the media blitz will go into effect before Ep 1 airs.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Do we know for sure that the casting spoilers for Angel 5 will be made clear before Ep 1 airs?
We've seen the official posters that are going to be released, so I think it is certain that the media blitz will go into effect before Ep 1 airs.
I can answer that question, Jon, but it would be spoilery ;)
Do we know for sure that the casting spoilers for Angel 5 will be made clear before Ep 1 airs?
Given that one of them was a requirement for renewing the show, and the promo posters they've been circulating as a result (ass-ugly, BTW), I would have to say that additive casting spoilers will, at the very least, be made so clear as to be understood by naked mole rats.
Good point about the official posters. And you're right Sue -- I don't want to be spoiled about that.
Anyway, I didn't want to make a big post about why I'm uncertain about how I'll vote. That belongs in Lightbulbs. I just wanted to make the point that not everyone who's against using the GFC is also for the proposal.
So, to clarify what is messed up in my head, if Joss showed up in the Angel thread and said, "I am SO stoked about Orlando Bloom joining the cast of Angel," would it be deleted, whitefonted, or accepted by all and speculated upon with ruthless passion?
Dude, we'd issue the man a warning.
He's too good for rules? We don't need him.
So, to clarify what is messed up in my head, if Joss showed up in the Angel thread and said, "I am SO stoked about Orlando Bloom joining the cast of Angel," would it be deleted, whitefonted, or accepted by all and speculated upon with ruthless passion?
Didn't Tim kinda do that once? As I recall, he got slathered in whitefont, but there wasn't any warning.
I think that right there is a good enough reason to suspend any grandfathering legislation, whether it applies or not.
84% of the people who voted want policies left in place until a certain date. Shall we chuck their opinion whenever we feel like it? Why do we vote if we're going to have a whole new form of concensus?
If the policy is grandfatherable that should be honored.
84% of the people who voted want policies left in place until a certain date.
Is FAQ policy? That's my question.
Didn't Tim kinda do that once? As I recall, he got slathered in whitefont, but there wasn't any warning.
I think he's done it more than once.
84% of the people who voted want policies left in place until a certain date. Shall we chuck their opinion whenever we feel like it?
Hey, guess what, I'm part of that 84%, and I bet Jon was, too, so stop making assumptions about what the hell my opinion was.