Seven.
'Potential'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
(that makes eight, actually)
9th
tenth
It was very mean-spirited, and what really annoys me is that it had a blatant spoiler for Un-Americans, who have not particularly been participants in this latest argument -- in other words, it was nastily punishing people who weren't even arguing with her.
Nutty, where are we in the documenting of the approved votes?
ita, I'm sorry -- context? You mean do we have a vote-counter for the current Light Bulb proposal? I don't know, but if not I can certainly volunteer.
As for the request warning on the table, I don't have an opinion, not yet having gotten through Natter for context. We are at one request and nine "yea"s on that matter however.
[edit: or more than ten. Whichbrings us to the warning stage.]
I missed the spoiler. but it was mean - and strange. and acutualy a flame -
this board gets heated but I have never really seen a flame before.
Nutty, where are we in the documenting of the approved votes?
ita, I'm sorry -- context?
I think she meant the collected decisions of the Buffistas stuff. Doesn't Jon have that?
Huh. Yeah, I'll be 10.
I think she meant the collected decisions of the Buffistas stuff. Doesn't Jon have that?
Yeah -- I've got it. I've been a Bad Buffista.