A vague disclaimer is nobody's friend.

Willow ,'Conversations with Dead People'


Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


amych - May 09, 2003 9:45:25 am PDT #1487 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Personally, I've wondered for a while whether the Due South and Smallville threads shouldn't be combined into a general HoYay thread.

I proposed this at the time we first moved over here, and there was a fair bit of opposition on the part of some Smallvillains. Since then, the thread has really slowed down, though, so it may not be a problem now.


Cindy - May 09, 2003 9:49:27 am PDT #1488 of 10005
Nobody

Okay. That just sent shivers down my spine. The Bitches have self-determination. Why can't we?

Please see my later comment as well, in which I asked Canadians to speak. Please see Sophia's comment. Please remember it was a "might" and "consider" sort of post, and not a "close them down" demand.

eta - I should clarify, I never visit the thread, and thought it was a show thread, not also a separate natter community. Sorry for the shivers and sorry if I sounded terse, above. I was actually going for reassuring.


Jon B. - May 09, 2003 9:59:24 am PDT #1489 of 10005
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Anti-prolif as I am, I'm not averse to Wonder Falls having its own thread. He's not just a grad, he's a poster.

So sayeth the moon lady. So shall it be done!


amych - May 09, 2003 10:03:12 am PDT #1490 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

I wonder (having just contributed to it myself) where this thread-stomping urge comes from all of a sudden.

I can see why we wouldn't have any more need for both NAFDA Buffy and Previously, for instance, because sadly, it'll all be previously. But it seems like a big leap to go from there to talking about eliminating anything else. And obviously people have attachments to certain sub-communities. I'm against proliferation, but does that have to mean being pro-deletion? I'm thinking not.

Wolfram, I'm going to pick you out of the lineup for a moment, but it's just as an example and not for any reasons of personal hate-ons, just so you know. IIRC I've seen you calling for the elimination of both FF threads a number of times, and pretty much from the day of the cancellation. And, well, why? To be blunt, if you don't want to see them, why not unsub and then they won't be in your message center.

And a question for ita and anyone else who can answer it: is there any technical reason (server load, whatev?) that it's better to get rid of stuff? I'd think that if something isn't being used much, it's not adding much to any sort of strain, either.


§ ita § - May 09, 2003 10:05:35 am PDT #1491 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

is there any technical reason (server load, whatev?) that it's better to get rid of stuff?

Yes. The smaller the number of posts in the posts table, the better. DX has wrapped up 5 of the natter threads f'rinstance, and we've lightened the table by 50,000 odd records. It is good.


amych - May 09, 2003 10:07:12 am PDT #1492 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Thanks, ita. Good to know. I just wanted to be sure we (by which I mean me) weren't getting caught up in a "hey, we could get rid of this!" binge needlessly.


Wolfram - May 09, 2003 10:13:05 am PDT #1493 of 10005
Visilurking

Wolfram, I'm going to pick you out of the lineup for a moment, but it's just as an example and not for any reasons of personal hate-ons, just so you know. IIRC I've seen you calling for the elimination of both FF threads a number of times, and pretty much from the day of the cancellation. And, well, why? To be blunt, if you don't want to see them, why not unsub and then they won't be in your message center.

Um, you don't recall correctly. This is the first time I've suggested eliminating any Firefly thread. So I can't respond to the rest of your post.

And I was talking about the spoiler thread since, prior to ita's post, I was thinking all the eps had aired and what's the spoiler thread still for? Obviously the Buffy spoilage lite thread could close for the same reason.

The "pro-deletion" stance is not about deleting threads, but it's about making room for threads that people seem to want without increasing the number of open threads. In essence, it's thread addition without proliferation through elimination of obsoletion. Not just pro-deletion.


amych - May 09, 2003 10:14:36 am PDT #1494 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Never mind, then, Wolfram -- I must've been thinking of someone else.


Julie - May 09, 2003 10:16:46 am PDT #1495 of 10005

In essence, it's thread addition without proliferation through elimination of obsoletion.

wow.. that sentence simultaneously hurt my head and made me marvel (Not Marvel) at the wonder that is the English Language.

Good job!


Wolfram - May 09, 2003 10:20:15 am PDT #1496 of 10005
Visilurking

Never mind, then, Wolfram -- I must've been thinking of someone else.

Funny, I get that a lot in bed. :)