~ma Houston-ward

Creek-don't-rise ~ma for Texas.

It's my 9th anniversary at work today. I'm celebrating by... sleeping in and working from home like I usually do on Fridays?

Wow, 9 years? Time flies like an arrow.

My coworker suggests I keep a bowl of Mucinex on my desk next to the candy dish. The cough sounds pretty ugly.

Fruit flies like a banana.

Chris got to it before me.

Safety ~ma to Houston and all in the path of the hurricane!

Fruit flies like a banana.

I thought it! I just didn't post it.

chrismg, if you're comfortable saying, where in Houston are your parents? Or have I asked you this before?

Safety~ma for your parents, chrismg.

Today's author problem: an author who believes, like 110%, that the process of having his article accepted for publication was the end of his involvement. In that process, authors are asked to revise things and then resubmit the article. (I should also note that they're also told in very plain language that their article will then be copy-edited and returned to them for approval.)

This author absolutely does not understand why I have sent him the edited article for approval because "This process ended 3 weeks ago and the article is to be published. I made all changes requested."

I explained that the article gets copy edited, and I sent him a copy of the author instructions that all author receive (which ALSO talk about the copy editing process). And then I asked him to review his article and return it. His reply? "I took care of this process 3 weeks ago." And then attached the email chain between him and the Editorial Office.

I gave up and kicked it up the food chain. And got his article bumped to a later issue because he won't return his article to us. Which I told him, though more diplomatically ("The significant delay in returning your edited article has led to the rescheduling of your article in a later issue of the journal. The Editorial Office will advise you of the new later date.")

I suspect maybe he's never been published before. But still, if you can read (which I assume you can if you are able to respond to my emails), you should be able to comprehend me telling you that further editing happens to all articles and you need to do your part.

I think someone way up the food chain is going to have to call this dolt and try to explain it via the spoken word. That would have happened sooner, but he's in China, and the staff tries to avoid calling international authors.

I feel like that would lead to a feeling other than "antsy."

Amputatedish isn't a word. Yet.