Yeah, uncertainty sucks. (I know whereof I speak, I've been in Brexit-induced limbo for the past year with no end in sight).
Natter 75: More Than a Million Natters Served
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I do think it's important to reiterate that most people have either employer-based insurance or Medicare/Medicaid government insurance.
It always seems a little weird to me that there is so much drama over a pretty small part of the health-care system.
Wow, 45 wasn't kidding when he said it was complicated.
Yeah, it's crazy complicated and the rhetoric can be really misleading. The Republicans mostly complain about the exchanges, but the real target is usually Medicaid since there is more money there.
I do think it's important to reiterate that most people have either employer-based insurance or Medicare/Medicaid government insurance.
And for those of us that don't, it is insanely expensive, with huge deductibles, and about everything isn't covered.
And when your source of insurance (along with your family's insurance) is your employer, you don't dare lose your job.
Yeah. I'd really like to go with single-payer or at least allow Medicare/Medicaid buy-in. I think the benefits for entrepreneurs would be tremendous and it would give people more flexibility.
At the least I'd like to have a program where you could get Medicaid for a period of time after losing a job. (Maybe paying for it above a certain previous income and a limit on how often you can get it)
I do think it's important to reiterate that most people have...employer-based insurance
It is still insanely expensive, with huge deductibles, and there is so much that still isn't covered.
Thanks for the explanation Gud - you've laid it out very clearly.
One side effect is that the number of people declaring bankruptcy because of having to pay medical bills has plummeted. And one of the problems with pre-Obamacare insurance policies was that people would pay their premiums but when they went to use insurance discovered that it didn't really cover anything. It would be cheap, but useless.
I've long thought that Republicans ought to be all about getting healthcare without an employer, as that frees people up to be entrepreneurs and start businesses and all that jazz
Of course, Congress isn't really doing anything about the basic problem that health-care is just too damn expensive.
Not too long ago I had a very painful abscess. I went to an urgent care clinic to treat it and they determined that it had to be lanced, but it was too deep for them to do and said I'd have to go to an ER. At this point I was in too much pain to start going to other urgent care clinics. At the ER a nurse practitioner did an ultrasound to locate the abscess and then lanced it. Took her maybe 40minutes. The total cost was $5,000 (after price adjustments for insurance) of which insurance covered about $3,000. That's insane.